A post about social anxiety disorder

A post about social anxiety disorder

I posted something on Medium called “You can’t just turn it off.”  It’s about my, uh, struggle with social anxiety disorder (so there’s one reason you can’t post comments on my blog).  It’s short.  I mentioned things I didn’t really want to mention, but helping erase the stigma surrounding mental illness in general is really important to me, more important than my ego.

I hope it helps someone.

Gab is open

Gab is open

Gab is no longer in closed beta.  Anyone can sign up for an account.

If you don’t know what Gab is (http://www.gab.ai), it is a social network in the mold of Twitter, with the upvote/downvote feature of Reddit.  Instead of a 150 character limit, you get a 300 character limit.  There’s hashtags and the ability to post pictures, follow other people, etc.  There is a paid tier with more features, and you can also simply donate money for the service’s upkeep.

I’ve been using it for a few months now, and I don’t have conversations with people – yet – but that’s also something you can do.

Gab is an alternative to Twitter, because the people at Twitter are biased.  Twitter lets terrorists post, but if some special snowflake is offended by anything a right-winger says, that right-winger gets suspended or permanently banned.  BLM douchebags can express racist hatred of white people all day long, but if a right-winger offers even the mildest criticism of the black community, they get suspended or banned.  Twitter does not apply their rules fairly.  That’s their right, and it’s your right to simply walk away and try something that treats people fairly.  That something is Gab.

There’s an Android app, but it’s a closed beta, I think it’s actually live and on Google Play.  I am not at home right now, so I used my iPhone to install it on my ghetto Verizon Android tablet.  They’ve been trying to get their iOS app off of the ground, but Apple are being jerks about it, since lots of right-wingers and alt-right people post on Gab, so to Apple that’s hate speech (but they let a lot of vile anti-Christian and anti-Republican stuff in the App Store).

I am on there as elainearias.  The link should be in the sidebar.  I am pretty happy about it, because it hasn’t attracted hordes of leftists yet, so if you say something salty, you won’t get a torrent of death threats from unhinged liberals.

Mention God or the Bible Anywhere, Get Lots of Hatred

Mention God or the Bible Anywhere, Get Lots of Hatred

I was just at a UFO site and someone mentioned God.  The Christian God, that is, and some atheist chimed in, stating that God was the biggest false God ever.

I swear, if you go to any mainstream or non-right wing/non-Christian website and mention God or any aspect of Christianity, some asshole atheist will chime in and denigrate you, God and religion in general.  I am absolutely sick of it.  I should probably talk to my therapist about it because it enrages me like nothing else, but I don’t want to talk politics or religion with, well, anyone that isn’t a close family member (and even among my family members there are some that I just don’t want to discuss politics with.  This is primarily because I am insecure).

I am sure most right-wingers and Christians have noticed this.  Can’t mention any aspect of our religion, no matter how mild, without being hounded and harassed by some disgruntled, hateful atheist.

Why do they keep doing this?  Why do they care if someone on this planet mentioned God?  So?  It’s like these assholes get a rise out of pissing us off.  I, for one, am not interested in “turning the other cheek” – I want to throw their bullshit right back in their face.  I just hate flame wars, which is why I usually avoid saying or writing anything.

And another thing.  I was laughed at on some Trump meme Facebook group for expressing concern that this psychotic, disturbing hatred for Christians will lead to active persecution of Christians in the west, but there are plenty of so-called “elites” who think there’s nothing wrong with persecuting Christians.

I don’t care if you’re an atheist.  I had a crisis of faith a couple of years ago.  I know it’s hard to believe in God sometimes and as I said, I don’t have a problem with most atheists, or anyone else of any other religion.

What I do have a problem with are assholes.  I have a problem with people who go out of their way to offend or hurt religious people.  This is becoming increasingly frequent in the West, and YES, it is scary to me.  YES, I believe that at some point, maybe in fifteen or twenty years, people like me will be physically attacked or worse, rounded up and taken to camps because so many people actively HATE Christians and Christianity.

These atheists never hesitate to insult and demean Christians.  It could be a blog post on some celebrity gossip blog, a comment on Reddit, something on YouTube or even a Christian movie’s iMDB page – there’s always an atheist there to declare that God doesn’t exist, and that Christianity is the cause of all the ills of the world.

What do you think is the next step after that?  The Final Solution.  If Christianity is responsible for all of the ills of the world, what does one do about That Which Causes All The Bad Things?

You get rid of it.

And how do you get rid of it?

Read a fucking history book and get back to me.  I suspect many of you already know the answer.

A brief update on things

A brief update on things

Okay, so I know I haven’t posted in quite a while.  I’ve been working on Nemesis and I’ve finished what’s essentially a fourth draft, but I am still not entirely happy with it.  Now it’s too long.  It feels like a quick read to me, but then I’ve always been a pretty fast reader.  I’m terrified to let other people read it, but I might enlist some of my family members as beta readers at this time.  Maybe.

I am also working on Blood Roses, partly because The Handmaid’s Tale is absolutely EVERYWHERE, with idiot feminazis and other assorted liberals acting as if Trump were God-Emporer Pope or some shit, ready to make birth control pills and abortions illegal TOMORROW.  Blood Roses depicts a world controlled by Sharia Law, which is scarier than anything coming from the so-called Religious Right.  Not that the Religious Right were ever comparable to fundamentalist Muslims and such, but the left would have you believe that they are.

As for The Black Witch by Laurie Forest…I am about half-way through that book.  I got sidetracked by The Road to Jonestown by Jeff Guinn (easily the best book of the year so far, at least in my eyes.  I am going to post a review soon-ish).  That was a far more riveting read than The Black Witch, but at least Laurie Forest’s novel got released.  I had preordered it a while ago and it was delivered to my Kindle.  Reading a digital version will be so much easier, because one of hte other reasons I didn’t want to read it as much was my tendency to rush to my computer to take copious notes every other page.  Reading it was a chore.

The leftist hysteria over the novel is unfounded, from what I’ve read so far.  I also found an interview by the author that essentially states that the novel was inspired by the gay marriage fight in her homestate.  As in, those awful Christians are such liars and monsters.  Despite her extremely low opinion of Christians, I don’t regret defending her from her own kind.  I could have very easily just left them to it – for the most part, it’s fun watching the left eat its own, but in this case, I could not stand by and let a falsehood go unchallenged.  I will finish the book and I will post a review.  It might not be this week or next week or even this month, but I will get to it eventually.  The book is just not that fun to read, to be honest.

So that’s where I am right now.  I have some posts lined up and if anyone is still reading this blog, there’ll be more to read soon.

Yes, hate reading can be fun

Yes, hate reading can be fun

pexels-photo-169915

I was moseying around on the Internet and came across this op-ed at the New York Times (yes, ew).  It is entitled “Why You Should Read Books You Hate” and is written by Pamela Paul. (Here is an archive.is link for those who don’t want to give NYT the hits, or in case they put it behind a paywall.)

The point of the article, so that you don’t have to bother, is to know thy enemy.

“Still, I persisted. A hundred pages later, I was more of a French socialist than I’d ever been before or since. I finished every wretched page of “The Fountainhead” in alternating states of fury and despair, and when it was finally over, I tried to leave the vague echo of Dominique, stomping around in her evening gowns, behind. What stuck was the abiding knowledge that I was not, nor would I ever be, a libertarian.”

This is in reference to Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead.  I rolled my eyes at this paragraph.  Anyone declaring that they’d never be a libertarian is an idiot at best, and a tyrannical statist at worst.  You are not required to like anything by Ayn Rand or agree with anything she’s written in order to be a libertarian.

I’d be a raging hypocrite if I didn’t admit that I essentially do the same thing.  The author, however, is not quite willing to admit that she’s not interested in opening her mind as much as she’s interested in literally hate reading something. Or, as I said earlier, knowing the enemy.

I do the same thing.  I’ve read a couple of essays in Lena Dunham’s book Not That Kind of Girl – particularly the one where she details her alleged rape at the hands of a purple cowboy boot wearing Republican.  I read Erika Johansen’s Queen of the Tearling, knowing that it’s a bunch of whiny leftist nonsense (and I was not wrong.  That book is total ass).  In fact, I am currently reading the sequel, Invasion of the Tearling and if I can survive that, I am going to read the last installment of the series, The Fate of the Tearling. Should be fun. /sarc

I’ve hate read a few other books, but I won’t get into it here.  Here is another key difference between me and this woman.  I’ve read books that have a lot of stuff I disagree with, and yet I enjoyed them.  I liked Malinda Lo’s Adaptation duology, despite having serious problems with some aspects of the story (such as the whole notion that if everyone communicated telepathically, there’d be no bigotry or hatred).  Oh, and to weave a quick update on the whole Laurie Forest saga – I am halfway through her book, The Black Witch, and some of the messaging is really heavy-handed but I like it anyway.  Her writing is gorgeous.  I am jealous.

I am going through my Read list on GoodReads and I’m seeing books I don’t remember reading.  Wow.

Anyway, back to the op-ed.  I did agree with this paragraph:

“As debaters know, sometimes you figure out your position only in opposition. All it takes is for me to read a book by Howard Zinn or Paul Johnson, each gleefully hate-worthy in its own polarizing way, to locate my own interpretation of history. This is what’s so invigorating about hate-reading. To actively grapple with your assumptions and defend your conclusions gives you a sense of purpose. You come to know where you stand, even if that means standing apart.”

Well, at least she acknowledges that Howard Zinn is full of shit.  I don’t have the stomach to read his crap…not yet.  I’ve honed my opinions after reading stuff I disagree with.  I’ve also gained additional insight from my hate readings.

And then there’s reading stuff simply because you know it’s gonna be bad.  Like Meghan McCain’s book Dirty Sexy Politics.  Oh my goodness, that book is just bad.  She’s a terrible writer, and her publisher either didn’t bother with an editor or got a really crappy one.

I wonder if she’s at all aware that libertarians and conservatives can essentially do the same thing.  I bet she expects books like The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas to totally change our minds and educate us!  By the way, I’m gonna hate read that one too.  I bet she would heavily criticize us for reading lefty books without changing our positions on certain issues, but that it’s totally okay to read Ayn Rand and go, “like, I’m never going to be a libertarian because they’re all patriarchal assholes!”

I would love to know if she thinks it’s okay for conservatives and libertarians to hate read lefty stuff and remain conservatives or libertarians.  I wonder if she would react badly to someone like me reading The Handmaid’s Tale and being that much more determined to defend Christianity while simultaneously calling out Islam for the patriarchal death cult that it is?  I bet she would, and that’s the issue I have with this op-ed and liberals in general.

Furthermore, would I or any other conservative or libertarian get credit for being open-minded enough to read a book we know will be offensive or disagreeable?  Probably not.

They are such raging hypocrites.

The lust for destruction can never be fulfilled

The lust for destruction can never be fulfilled

animal-dog-pet-dangerous

Another day, another ZOMG SHE’S RACIST U GUISE campaign.

Yes, the vicious social justice warrior feminazi hags are on the march for yet another scalp. They nearly destroyed Keira Drake’s literary career before it began, of which resulted in the year-long delay of her debut novel’s release (presumably, as I stated earlier, to make the bad guys into straight white Christian males).

They tried to wreck Veronica Roth’s career by throwing around allegations that her latest novel, Carve the Mark was racist (I’ve read the book and I can tell you that it is definitely NOT racist). That clearly didn’t work, so now they’re going after someone else.

Laurie Forest is the target du jour for the moment. Her debut YA fantasy novel, The Black Witch, is due to be released on May 2, 2017. Her publisher is Harlequin TEEN, the same publishing house that will – eventually – release Keira Drake’s The Continent. They caved in to the demands of the feminazi SJW mob earlier this year. Will they do the same?

Laurie Forest’s novel has been getting more positive buzz. She got a favorable blurb from Tamora Pierce, a well-established fantasy author. Entertainment Weekly published an excerpt of the novel. We’ve got a month and a half to go, and the publisher hasn’t made any noise about pulling the book from release. GoodReads is even running a contest, and the prize is an ARC. It’s still up for grabs at NetGalley too. I’ve requested it at NetGalley, I’ve entered the contest and I’ve even got my eye on a copy over at eBay. This time, I’m going to get my hands on a copy, and I will read it for myself.

This is just so ridiculous.  It really is, and the longer it goes on, the angrier I get.

I’m a “person of color” and God, I fucking HATE that phrase.  How the hell is it any different than “colored people”?  You dipshits would lose your damn minds if someone called a black person “colored” but calling them a “person of color” is okay simply because “someone” chose it?  The fuck?

I didn’t choose it.  I am a person.  Not colored.  Just a person.  My point is this:  I bet a great deal of these feminazi hagbitches are white.  If I am correct, I have one very important thing to say to them:

Stop this white knight bullshit.  I don’t need you as an “ally.”  I don’t need you lily white bitches to “protect” me from racism.  I can look at an old-timey person in blackface and not be traumatized by it.  I can look at a racist caricature of a black person and not be traumatized by it.  My mother, who is totally black, collects racist caricature figurines!  I am not that bothered by those old-fashioned depiction of black people.  The depictions can be sometimes sad, and alternately amusing.  I am only 35 anyway.  It might mean something different to my grandfather, who grew up in the segregated South.  He faced real racism.  What you bitches “face” today is not the same thing.  At all.

I can read a book about racist people and not be traumatized by it.  I can read a book and not become a racist, hateful person.  I don’t need you to protect me from anything.

Oh, and note:  a great deal of black people, and other Minorities are just like me.  They don’t need to be “protected” either.

I am sick and tired of this stupid, bullshit anti-racism crusade these bitches are on.

So what if a character in a given book is racist?  That does not mean the author is racist.  The villain in my book is a rapist and a pervert who says racist things (and yet insists that he is not racist because he is sexually obsessed with a black girl).  That does not mean I’m a racist rapist and that does not mean I support or endorse racists, rapists or any combination thereof.  JESUS.

Seriously, Jesus needs to come back and get my ass.  I hate this planet and I don’t want to live on it anymore.  I know I am not always good to Him and I’m usually a wretched asshole, but honestly, I don’t know how much more of this I can take.  I hate the idea that these cunts have any influence on my life whatsoever, and yet they do, BECAUSE THEY VOTE.

That makes me pretty fucking angry.  The fact that their existence has any affect on my life, however minute and small, is a great and heinous injustice.  They vote.  Somewhere, some bureaucratic fuck hired by a wretched politician they voted for is making some kind of decision that affects my life as I type this post.

Thing is, these bitches are drunk and high on their own self-righteousness.  All of our schools – public and private; I’ve attended both – bombard us with the Civil Rights era. They all want to be part of their own Civil Rights Movement, and since the real one ended about twenty years before I was born, they gotta stretch and find more random shit to be angry about. Don’t get me wrong – our schools should teach us about the Civil Rights era, because it’s an important part of our history.  Unfortunately, when they do teach it, a lot of it is simplified and turned into some demented fairy tale, complete with LIES.  Lies, such as “Nixon and the Republicans were racist!”  No.  The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would not have passed without the unanimous support of the Republican Party.  Look it up if you don’t believe me.

The Civil Rights era is dumbed down thusly:  White people, evil; black people, perpetual victims and slaves.  The black experience was  more complex than that.  Yes, terrible things were done to black people.  I recently spent an entire evening looking up the lynching of Jesse Washington.  I didn’t learn about that in high school.  It was a horrific example of a black person being not just hung in public, but burned alive and mutilated, all for the enjoyment of the residents of Waco, Texas.  This was after he allegedly “confessed” to murdering a white woman.  Oh, but it gets worse.  A photographer was there.  He took pictures and those photos were printed on postcards and sold.

Then there’s the story of Emmett Till.  Recently, a white artist painted a portrait of Emmett’s corpse.  It was a terrible painting – technically, I mean.  The racial grievance mob insisted that the woman had no right to paint Emmett Till simply because she was white.

I know racism exists.  I know that things were really bad for black people in the past, and I know that we’re all lucky to have survived.  That teenage farmhand could very easily been one of my ancestors.  It’s harrowing and scary.

They never talk about the good things, about how not all blacks were slaves, and that some even had their own businesses!  There’s so much about the black experience that none of us ever really learn about, all so that black people are presented as these eternal victims.  This then feeds into the vengeful hatred that blacks have for cops and whitey.

One YA fantasy novel, or even a zillion fantasy novels with “questionable” passages cannot possibly compare to what black people actually went through.  It’s nowhere near the same.  We will survive a racist book.  That’s even assuming the book is racist, which, in all likelihood, is probably not.  After all, SJWs always lie, as Vox Day says.

Oh, and becuase I just gotta make this even longer, I see the three rules of SJWs Always Lie in play here.

  1.  SJWs always lie
  2. SJWs always double down
  3. SJWs always project

They lied about Veronica Roth’s book.  I cannot confirm if they lied about Keira Drake’s book.  After all, I have not read it.  I have not read Laurie Forest’s book either.  That being said, these people lie about pretty much everything else.  Or, on the other hand, they take their opinion and present it as fact, which is a form of lying.  They believe that because Laurie Forest’s characters said something that could be construed as racist, that the book is racist propaganda, that the author is racist and that the author wants everyone else to be racist too.

They doubled down once they were victorious in getting Keira Drake’s book postponed.  Same with the wreckage of Milo Yiannopolis’s book deal with Simon & Schuster.  Now they’re doing the same thing to Laurie Forest.  They tried doing this to Veronica Roth, but she’s too successful and established, and their allegations of racism were easily debunked.  These two novels, The Continent and The Black Witch have not been released yet.  It’s easier to make up a bunch of lies because only a handful of people have access to ARCs.

They are, in all likelihood, secretly racist themselves and feel guilty for reading something that might remind them of their secret racist tendencies.  Or, they’re racist against white people, which is still fucking racism.  They cannot endure anything that might trigger their latent racism because then their libtard buddies won’t want to be friends with them, so they go on these ridiculous crusades against random people.

This is long enough now.  Also, I have scored a copy of The Black Witch off of eBay.  It’s an ARC, and I paid about $23 for it.  Well worth the price because if these hags succeed, my preorder will be canceled.  I will begin reading it and will post a review once I’m done.

Gosnell, the most prolific serial killer

Gosnell, the most prolific serial killer

ca5fabortion-clinic-gosnell-3

Image Source:  The Ampersand

 

I just finished the Gosnell book by Ann McElhinney and Phelim McAleer.  I posted a brief review here.  This is especially apt, given that Tomi Lahren, so-called conservative firebrand, is getting a lot of crap for her pro-choice declaration on The View.

As I say in the review, I don’t know how anyone can be pro-abortion after reading the details of the case.  I have also read the grand jury’s report, and I’ve seen the pictures.  I even watched the documentary 3801 Lancaster, of which is currently on Amazon Prime, and can be watched for free if you’re a Prime member.

When I watched that documentary, I was a little irritated at the Planned Parenthood reps, who declared that they were still pro-choice.  Then, after a month or so, I realized that they were incredibly brave to appear in the documentary and express their horror and dismay at the conditions of Gosnell’s clinic.  So yeah, it’s possible to remain pro-choice after studying this case, but I personally cannot.  I never was pro-choice, really.  I hate using that term, to be honest.  I usually label myself anti-abortion, and pro-choicers are pro-abortion in my eyes.

I might do a post on Tomi Lahren, although after finishing the Gosnell book, I just don’t feel like it as much anymore.  It’s such a depressing subject and I’ve already had a really bad day.

Anyhow, one more thing I want to say.  Not only was Gosnell an outright murderer, he was a shockingly incompetent and greedy person.  A great deal of his abortions were totally botched, necessitating the whole neck-snipping thing.  He also clearly got a kick out of snipping the necks of those babies, and keeping their feet as trophies.

And the clinic…look, I’m a crazy cat lady, but even I wouldn’t want to be treated in a clinic overrun with cats.  Precious kitties do not belong in health clinics unless it’s a veterinarian’s office.

Oh, and the government…Gosnell wouldn’t have killed nearly as many babies, nor would his botched procedures have claimed the lives of at least two women if the government had done it’s damn job.  He had unlicensed and completely unqualified people administering medication to the patients, he had no working equipment and was resuing tools that were single-use only.  Some people got venereal diseases after being treated at his clinic.

The defense lawyer’s excuse was, “well, what did you expect?  This was a clinic for poor people!”  So poor people don’t deserve to be treated in a clean clinic with sterilized equipment?  It is possible to run a clean, standards-compliant clinic with qualified, licensed personnel, you know.  That just blew my mind.

Anyway, this post is actually longer than the book review.  Oh well.  It’s a really good book, even if you’ve already read the grand jury report.  This one also covers the trial, and the meeting the authors had with Gosnell.  Good, but harrowing.

It’s sad when your favorite artist hates you

It’s sad when your favorite artist hates you

I just read through the lyrics for the song “Samaritan” by ionnalee, and it’s anti-Christian, with a hefty bit of whining about her fans being “impatient” for new material from her. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, my post “Beyonce is not a goddess” explains it all. This line pissed me off:

“I don’t believe in a god, let’s leave religion out of all this”

Really?  Because first of all, you shamelessly used imagery from MY religion in your work.  YOU brought up religion, not us.  You don’t get to steal from my religion without me or anyone else having something to say about it.

Also…what a serious, hardcore first world problem.  So a handful of fans are impatient?  So the fuck what?  Shouldn’t you be focusing on, oh I don’t know…your music?  Your career?  Your social life?

She doesn’t mention the Christian god, but it’s obvious as to who she is talking about.  Liberals think they can simply say “god” and “religion” so as to later claim that they’re not trashing Christianity, they’re trashing all of religion.

Yet, as I said, the teaser video contains Christian imagery.  The lyrics contain Christian imagery.  Therefore, she’s talking about Christianity.

I have no problem with atheists, but I do have a problem with people who hate Christianity and try to turn it into something it’s not, which she has clearly done.

I haven’t watched the video for the song, nor have I listened to the song itself (it’s on Spotify, if you’re curious) and I have no desire to do either.  I’m done.

A peek into the sordid minds of the so-called elite

A peek into the sordid minds of the so-called elite

Ann Barnhardt is a fearless Catholic warrior.  She’s probably the most consistently devout Christian I have ever seen.  If only I had her strong faith and determination to do what’s right.

She recently went to a restaurant and overheard a conversation amongst a bunch of snooty “elite” douchebags – a German man, an American professor at Columbia University, a Swiss man, a Jewish man and a gay man.  They talked about the New World Order and what they hope to happen in the near future.  Ann managed to document the details of this conversation, although there is no actual transcript of their words.  Still, it’s enlightening:

Part One

There’s some stuff about how nationalism is so HORRIBLE, but I don’t want to bother with that right now.  The first thing that really stood out to me was how utterly hypocritical these progressives really are.  They all talk a good game about respecting women and feminism and so forth, but then have this to say about some Dutch woman speaking at a conference:

They then started talking about the speakers at the conference.  One was a Dutch female law professor.  “Is she straight?” “Yeah, she’s straight. And she expects to be submitted to because of her gender!”

Okay, so they would have “submitted” to her if she had been a lesbian, but fuck straight women.  Technically, I agree – we shouldn’t agree with or “submit to” anybody because of their gender, but progressives CLEARLY expect the rest of us to submit to the gay man because he’s a victim of those nasty Christians, the black man because he’s a victim of racism, and the woman because she’s a victim of the patriarchy.  In other words, we’re expected to submit to the gay man because he’s gay, the black man because he’s black, and the woman because she’s a woman.  If you do not meet their stringent requirements of Professional Victimhood, however, then fuck you, your opinion is wholly and utterly irrelevant.

Oh, and this next bit:

“The Swiss lawyer, it turns out, also has a private practice. When the Fag started talking about how all “private law” is really just a subset of the “imperial governmental” paradigm, and cited ICANN as his example, the Swiss came right out and said that the only possible model is total global control of all trade and businesses. Global Fascism.  He said the “biggest player” is the “OMNIPOTENT REGULATOR”, which can be the “good company”, that is a company that is fully controlled by and submissive to the state, “that is so powerful” that it becomes the de facto regulator.  His example?  You guessed it: Apple.”

Yeah, that’s fucking scary.  THAT right there is why I am not a globalist.  I’m a nationalist.  I’m not afraid to say it.  Ugh, and I’m typing this on my MacBook Pro while listening to music on my old iPhone 5c (I use an iPhone 6 Plus as my regular phone – as in, the one I take phone calls on).

Just, no.  Global control of all trade and businesses?  Yeah, say goodbye to freedom.  As surely as state rights here in the US are important and wonderful – don’t like the way California is run?  Move to North Dakota! – so is the concept of different nations.  If the world is run the way Germany or Sweden is run, we’re fucked.  There’s nowhere else to go.  If the world were run by Saudi Arabia, we’d be really fucked.  Might as well fucking kill yourself.  I mean, look at Europe – the EU is already a clusterfuck.  You really think that’s gonna work on a global scale?  Spoiler alert:  it won’t.  There are too many distinct cultures in this world and countries like China and Japan aren’t gonna give that up anytime soon.

But these brain dead degenerates will die trying to make their demented dream a reality, all at the expense of everybody else.

Also, here’s some more progressive hypocrisy:

“The Swiss then, in the context of Apple, assured the table that with regards to human rights, “they only do it for the public perception”.  The point being, since Apple is “omnipotent”, they are their own regulator, and they decide what their human rights regulations will be.  Then the grumpy Columbia professor chimed in: Apple absolutely breaks the law in Asia, but we (the former U.S.) are fine with that, because it is all “handled between friends”.  Apple is for the “greater good” – that is the globalist-fascist agenda – so “why not let them flex their power?””

They just flat out don’t fucking care.  The regulations we Americans are subject to are clearly killing the economy, and yet China can basically do whatever the hell it wants.  Apple, a company hell bent on promoting homosexuality, transgenderism and the eradication of global warming has no problem running factories in China, of which have horrific working conditions.  To be honest, Microsoft isn’t much better.  Most of the major PC manufacturers aren’t much better either.

Furthermore, this is utterly rich coming from these twats.  The left whines and cries all damn day long about how horrible powerful corporations are, and yet these douchenozzles have no problem with Apple being above the law and deciding their own human rights regulations.  Bottom line:  as Ann said, Apple is willing to promote their agenda, so the ends clearly justify the means.

I used to think the hypocrisy argument would work on these assholes.  It clearly worked on Christianity.  Now nobody wants to be a Christian because a) they’re hypocrites, and b) they supposedly hate sex, and it’s obvious that Western society is so obsessed with sex that they’re willing to slaughter innocents to keep the sexual revolution going (abortion).

That’s all I have to say about part one.  I highly recommend reading all three parts in their entirety.

Part Two

So these dillweeds clearly don’t like Trump, which is utterly unsurprising.  The first topic in this part is about the homosexual stating that they don’t need laws from the “periphery.”  So who is the periphery?

“Understand that what he means by “periphery” is anyone outside of the Boston-New-York-Washington DC metroplex, and the San Francisco-Los Angels corridor, having any say in anything.  Like, VOTING.”

Surprise, surprise.  These coastal elite assholes think we shouldn’t even EXIST.  They hate us so much. I wouldn’t be surprised if they had a plan to murder everyone in Middle America, and people like me, who live in coastal states but don’t conform to their fascist insanity.

Ann is not a Trump supporter, which is okay.  She then goes on to say,

“It is for anyone that they perceive to be “beneath them” – not of the Ivy League law school coastal  elite.  And the truth is, they’re all trash, and deep down, they know it.  Class is a bearing, a mode of conduct, not a resume, not a designer label, and certainly not a net worth.”

So true.  There’s some stuff about a shadow economy consisting of Facebook, Airbnb and other services, and that trade in goods will be fully centralized, which, as I said, is scary.  Ugh…could you imagine every aspect of your life being dictated to by some faceless bureaucrat a continent away?

The rest of it is about how much these asshats hate Trump, and how they’re gonna take him down.  So how will they take him down?

“Columbia Commie:  THE SECURITIES ESTABLISHMENT WILL TAKE TRUMP DOWN FIRST AND FOREMOST, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CIA AND FBI.”

Remember this.  We must be vigilant.  As far as I know, Trump is the only one, besides members of his cabinet, willing to fight the globalists.  He may be a puppet, he might not be. I don’t know, but for now, I choose to trust that he is who he says he is.  Plus, he drives the left crazy.

Part Three

This one is about the economic future, as well as some stuff about the Oscars.  However, there’s only one thing I want to discuss right now, and it’s this:

“Swiss:  Trump is going to war with Iran.

Table: Sunni states against Trump are sending terrorists.

Swiss: Yes, this is very reassuring. The Germans are encouraging them. Very, very good thing. It is dangerous because the situation is fragile, but overall it is very good…

Fag: Yes, because the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

(I don’t think it gets any clearer than that, folks. As I have been screeching for years, these people view the Islamic political system as its mercenary army, and are consciously using it to advance their agenda without getting their hands dirty – for now.)”

I’ve been saying this to myself for a couple of years now.  I’ve bolded the part I feel the most significant, and Ann obviously felt it was significant too.  THIS, right here, is why the gay community (and, by extension, feminists) are so heavily aligned with Islam and those who practice it.  THIS is why the left uniformly bends over backwards to defend Islam in the face of crystal clear evidence that a great deal of Muslims are bloodthirsty monsters hellbent on killing anyone that isn’t willing to submit.  I hate to state that all Muslims are bloodthirsty monsters, and I actually did not state that, but liberals will accuse me of saying it anyway.  I have no problem with peaceful Muslims willing to leave me in peace.  But if you’re the kind who thinks it’s okay to drench a girl in acid simply because she went to school or looked at a boy, then fuck you.  If you’re the kind who thinks it’s okay to throw gay people off of a rooftop, then fuck you.  If you think it’s okay to kill someone because they drew a picture of your religious figures, then fuck you.  Besides, that’s awfully close to idolatry, you know.  Who should one revere more – an earthly prophet, or Allah?  Seems contradictory to me, and that by trying to avoid idolatry, you actually commit idolatry for losing your damn mind over a drawing.

These leftists are fucking cowards – too cowardly to fucking kill us themselves.  They rely on Muslims to commit genocide wherever they go, so that us, the “undesirables” are dealt with at no financial cost to themselves.

Remember this:  leftists are completely and utterly comfortable with being hypocrites.  They don’t care.  They operate entirely on double-standards.  They’re allowed to be hypocrites, but Republicans and Christians are not.

The ONLY reason leftists support Muslims is this:  they’re counting on Muslims to kill us.  It’s that simple.

There’s a lot of scary stuff in part three too.  As I said, I recommend reading all three parts.

New theme

New theme

Ah, finally, a theme I like!  This one’s nicer and more readable, although if you view it on an iPad, the sidebar stuff appears at the bottom of the page, which is something I’m not crazy about, but oh well.  I did some minor customizations to this one, as the previous two themes were a total trainwreck.  This one looks much better.

I plan on learning to create my own WordPress themes, as I have a degree in web design.  It’s all about making myself do it.

I also have a very long essay in the works.  Started it on Friday, might finish it today.