Ann Barnhardt is a fearless Catholic warrior. She’s probably the most consistently devout Christian I have ever seen. If only I had her strong faith and determination to do what’s right.
She recently went to a restaurant and overheard a conversation amongst a bunch of snooty “elite” douchebags – a German man, an American professor at Columbia University, a Swiss man, a Jewish man and a gay man. They talked about the New World Order and what they hope to happen in the near future. Ann managed to document the details of this conversation, although there is no actual transcript of their words. Still, it’s enlightening:
There’s some stuff about how nationalism is so HORRIBLE, but I don’t want to bother with that right now. The first thing that really stood out to me was how utterly hypocritical these progressives really are. They all talk a good game about respecting women and feminism and so forth, but then have this to say about some Dutch woman speaking at a conference:
They then started talking about the speakers at the conference. One was a Dutch female law professor. “Is she straight?” “Yeah, she’s straight. And she expects to be submitted to because of her gender!”
Okay, so they would have “submitted” to her if she had been a lesbian, but fuck straight women. Technically, I agree – we shouldn’t agree with or “submit to” anybody because of their gender, but progressives CLEARLY expect the rest of us to submit to the gay man because he’s a victim of those nasty Christians, the black man because he’s a victim of racism, and the woman because she’s a victim of the patriarchy. In other words, we’re expected to submit to the gay man because he’s gay, the black man because he’s black, and the woman because she’s a woman. If you do not meet their stringent requirements of Professional Victimhood, however, then fuck you, your opinion is wholly and utterly irrelevant.
Oh, and this next bit:
“The Swiss lawyer, it turns out, also has a private practice. When the Fag started talking about how all “private law” is really just a subset of the “imperial governmental” paradigm, and cited ICANN as his example, the Swiss came right out and said that the only possible model is total global control of all trade and businesses. Global Fascism. He said the “biggest player” is the “OMNIPOTENT REGULATOR”, which can be the “good company”, that is a company that is fully controlled by and submissive to the state, “that is so powerful” that it becomes the de facto regulator. His example? You guessed it: Apple.”
Yeah, that’s fucking scary. THAT right there is why I am not a globalist. I’m a nationalist. I’m not afraid to say it. Ugh, and I’m typing this on my MacBook Pro while listening to music on my old iPhone 5c (I use an iPhone 6 Plus as my regular phone – as in, the one I take phone calls on).
Just, no. Global control of all trade and businesses? Yeah, say goodbye to freedom. As surely as state rights here in the US are important and wonderful – don’t like the way California is run? Move to North Dakota! – so is the concept of different nations. If the world is run the way Germany or Sweden is run, we’re fucked. There’s nowhere else to go. If the world were run by Saudi Arabia, we’d be really fucked. Might as well fucking kill yourself. I mean, look at Europe – the EU is already a clusterfuck. You really think that’s gonna work on a global scale? Spoiler alert: it won’t. There are too many distinct cultures in this world and countries like China and Japan aren’t gonna give that up anytime soon.
But these brain dead degenerates will die trying to make their demented dream a reality, all at the expense of everybody else.
Also, here’s some more progressive hypocrisy:
“The Swiss then, in the context of Apple, assured the table that with regards to human rights, “they only do it for the public perception”. The point being, since Apple is “omnipotent”, they are their own regulator, and they decide what their human rights regulations will be. Then the grumpy Columbia professor chimed in: Apple absolutely breaks the law in Asia, but we (the former U.S.) are fine with that, because it is all “handled between friends”. Apple is for the “greater good” – that is the globalist-fascist agenda – so “why not let them flex their power?””
They just flat out don’t fucking care. The regulations we Americans are subject to are clearly killing the economy, and yet China can basically do whatever the hell it wants. Apple, a company hell bent on promoting homosexuality, transgenderism and the eradication of global warming has no problem running factories in China, of which have horrific working conditions. To be honest, Microsoft isn’t much better. Most of the major PC manufacturers aren’t much better either.
Furthermore, this is utterly rich coming from these twats. The left whines and cries all damn day long about how horrible powerful corporations are, and yet these douchenozzles have no problem with Apple being above the law and deciding their own human rights regulations. Bottom line: as Ann said, Apple is willing to promote their agenda, so the ends clearly justify the means.
I used to think the hypocrisy argument would work on these assholes. It clearly worked on Christianity. Now nobody wants to be a Christian because a) they’re hypocrites, and b) they supposedly hate sex, and it’s obvious that Western society is so obsessed with sex that they’re willing to slaughter innocents to keep the sexual revolution going (abortion).
That’s all I have to say about part one. I highly recommend reading all three parts in their entirety.
So these dillweeds clearly don’t like Trump, which is utterly unsurprising. The first topic in this part is about the homosexual stating that they don’t need laws from the “periphery.” So who is the periphery?
“Understand that what he means by “periphery” is anyone outside of the Boston-New-York-Washington DC metroplex, and the San Francisco-Los Angels corridor, having any say in anything. Like, VOTING.”
Surprise, surprise. These coastal elite assholes think we shouldn’t even EXIST. They hate us so much. I wouldn’t be surprised if they had a plan to murder everyone in Middle America, and people like me, who live in coastal states but don’t conform to their fascist insanity.
Ann is not a Trump supporter, which is okay. She then goes on to say,
“It is for anyone that they perceive to be “beneath them” – not of the Ivy League law school coastal elite. And the truth is, they’re all trash, and deep down, they know it. Class is a bearing, a mode of conduct, not a resume, not a designer label, and certainly not a net worth.”
So true. There’s some stuff about a shadow economy consisting of Facebook, Airbnb and other services, and that trade in goods will be fully centralized, which, as I said, is scary. Ugh…could you imagine every aspect of your life being dictated to by some faceless bureaucrat a continent away?
The rest of it is about how much these asshats hate Trump, and how they’re gonna take him down. So how will they take him down?
“Columbia Commie: THE SECURITIES ESTABLISHMENT WILL TAKE TRUMP DOWN FIRST AND FOREMOST, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CIA AND FBI.”
Remember this. We must be vigilant. As far as I know, Trump is the only one, besides members of his cabinet, willing to fight the globalists. He may be a puppet, he might not be. I don’t know, but for now, I choose to trust that he is who he says he is. Plus, he drives the left crazy.
This one is about the economic future, as well as some stuff about the Oscars. However, there’s only one thing I want to discuss right now, and it’s this:
“Swiss: Trump is going to war with Iran.
Table: Sunni states against Trump are sending terrorists.
Swiss: Yes, this is very reassuring. The Germans are encouraging them. Very, very good thing. It is dangerous because the situation is fragile, but overall it is very good…
Fag: Yes, because the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
(I don’t think it gets any clearer than that, folks. As I have been screeching for years, these people view the Islamic political system as its mercenary army, and are consciously using it to advance their agenda without getting their hands dirty – for now.)”
I’ve been saying this to myself for a couple of years now. I’ve bolded the part I feel the most significant, and Ann obviously felt it was significant too. THIS, right here, is why the gay community (and, by extension, feminists) are so heavily aligned with Islam and those who practice it. THIS is why the left uniformly bends over backwards to defend Islam in the face of crystal clear evidence that a great deal of Muslims are bloodthirsty monsters hellbent on killing anyone that isn’t willing to submit. I hate to state that all Muslims are bloodthirsty monsters, and I actually did not state that, but liberals will accuse me of saying it anyway. I have no problem with peaceful Muslims willing to leave me in peace. But if you’re the kind who thinks it’s okay to drench a girl in acid simply because she went to school or looked at a boy, then fuck you. If you’re the kind who thinks it’s okay to throw gay people off of a rooftop, then fuck you. If you think it’s okay to kill someone because they drew a picture of your religious figures, then fuck you. Besides, that’s awfully close to idolatry, you know. Who should one revere more – an earthly prophet, or Allah? Seems contradictory to me, and that by trying to avoid idolatry, you actually commit idolatry for losing your damn mind over a drawing.
These leftists are fucking cowards – too cowardly to fucking kill us themselves. They rely on Muslims to commit genocide wherever they go, so that us, the “undesirables” are dealt with at no financial cost to themselves.
Remember this: leftists are completely and utterly comfortable with being hypocrites. They don’t care. They operate entirely on double-standards. They’re allowed to be hypocrites, but Republicans and Christians are not.
The ONLY reason leftists support Muslims is this: they’re counting on Muslims to kill us. It’s that simple.
There’s a lot of scary stuff in part three too. As I said, I recommend reading all three parts.