Browsed by
Month: November 2018

Liberal Hypocrisy: Gaming Edition

Liberal Hypocrisy: Gaming Edition

So I’m gonna have to get a copy of Red Dead Redemption 2, because you can kill feminazis in it.  This is according to ViceVice is donkey shit, just so you know.

‘Red Dead Redemption 2’ Players Are Excited to Kill Feminists in the Game

Rockstar Games included a historically accurate portrayal of women fighting for their right to vote, and players are making the worst of it.

Archive link so you don’t get donkey shit on your computer.

But I remember some shitty games from a few years ago, where you could kill tea partiers and stuff.  Funny how Vice didn’t go in rage mode when this shitty game was released:

Gamescom: Shoot Racist Tea Partiers in ‘Battlefield Hardline’ | Breitbart

In the upcoming first-person shooter Battlefield Hardline, players will shoot and kill racist anti-government Tea Party types, Gadsden flag and all.Gamers |

This was from 2014.

And how about this game from 2011, called Tea Party Zombies Must Die.  Real subtle, fuckers:

In new game, Tea Partiers make “zombie” targets

“Tea Party Zombies Must Die,” an online video game, features prominent Tea Party figures as targets.

Oh, but killing suffragettes is just so awful!  Look, I’m glad I have the right to vote (I voted early, and a straight Republican ticket because fuck the Democrats) and the suffragettes weren’t that bad, but I bet the ones in this game are probably super obnoxious feminazis.  I just hate the double standard.

In 2016 a game called Stump the Trump was released in which you could kill Trump.  Of course, a game where you can kill Pelosi or whoever is just super bad and wrong, of course.

You Can Brutally Kill Donald Trump In A New Video Game. Progressive Outrage Nowhere To Be Found. | Breitbart

A new browser-based game, “Stump The Trump” allows you to kill Republican frontrunner Donald Trump by dropping a large tree stump on him. His death is |

By the way, that game looks like utter dogshit.

I wrote about Far Cry 5, but it turns out that the game isn’t a “kill Republicans” simulator, and the left was super butthurt about it.

No, Far Cry 5 Isn’t About “Fighting Trump Supporters” – Mandatory

Many have made comparisons between Far Cry 5 and current US politics.

I still have no real desire to play that game, though.

Wolfenstein II conflated Nazis with Trump supporters.

Nazi-killing video game “Wolfenstein II” angers Nazis with ‘Make America Nazi-Free Again’ slogans

A portion of the internet is upset because a game promotes killing virtual Nazis in a virtual America with a play on Trump’s slogan.

Newsweek does the same thing. Newsweek is also dogshit.  Here’s an archive link in case you don’t want to give them any hits.

Rosie O’Donnell promotes a game in which you can push Trump off a cliff (must be some shitty Flash ‘game’ hosted on some random website, because the gameplay sounds nonexistent):

Rosie O’Donnell sparks outrage with Trump-killing game

Conservatives were not amused.

But if I were to make a game in which you push some stupid leftist asshole off of a cliff and straight into a running meat grinder…ooh, that’s violent and disturbing and problematic. 

People Are Excited to Kill Republican White Men in Far Cry 5

One particular teaser for Far Cry 5 is its poster which showcases a group of white people with an American flag and are most probably the bad guys.

This shitty website also seems gleeful that you might have gotten to kill “Republican White Men” in Far Cry 5, and probably got mega butthurt when that wasn’t quite the case.  See, that’s okay.  Not disturbing at all, but shoot some fucking suffragettes, and you’re evil incarnate.

Okay, so you’re probably wondering what the fuss is all about?  So, I haven’t played the Red Dead Redemption series, but I watched the infamous video in question and it appears that yes, you can kill a suffragette character in the game, but it’s considered a crime in the game world.  If you do it in front of witnesses, you incur a bounty that increases over time.  You know, like in most open world RPG games.  I am such a raging goody-two-shoes in these kinds of games.  I don’t commit any crimes if I don’t absolutely have to, and yet I’d do it just to shut that irritating nag up.

The game’s interface looks a lot like that of Horizon Zero Dawn, a game I’m currently playing (one I enjoy, even though it’s got some lefty crap like most games).  I want this game even more now.

So here’s the video in question.  There’s others, but this one is what got the poor widdle feminazis all in a tizzy.  It’s fine to take a chainsaw to zombie Sarah Palin, but feeding some annoying suffragette to an alligator?  Perish the thought!

I thought it was hilarious.  Kind of disturbing, but hilarious, and all the more because leftist are so offended by it.  Also, the suffragette is really annoying and her reasons for wanting the vote are rather modern.  She goes on about how letting women vote would be an end to wars and stuff, and how women would do it better, and that they might even have a woman president.  Ugh.

Oh, and in the leftist games above, the whole point is to actually kill Republicans/Trump/Tea Partiers.  This is just one gamer killing one NPC, and the game pretty much punishes you for it.  Or attempts to.  The leftist games are much worse, obviously.  Yet Vice probably had no qualms about those games.

So, I know what I want for Christmas.

Gab is back!

Gab is back!

Gab haters BTFO!  Gab was back online yesterday afternoon, and I am SO happy.  I really should have had more faith in Andrew Torba and the Gab team.  They found a friendly host, domain registrar and payment processor.  Now, some are claiming that Gab has gone back on its “free speech” thing because they’re asking users to report anything that violates their user guidelines, but I am pretty sure Gab has always had user guidelines.  They can only really be enforced when someone actually reports violations.  Gab is still a small start up.  They can’t afford to pay armies of moderators to comb through all the posts and find violations.  If users see something and don’t think it’s worth reporting, then…there isn’t much Gab can do about that, is there?

But that will probably change.  I don’t know how I feel about that.  I want Gab to be completely free speech.  Every time I see racist or anti-Semitic crap, I just mute it.  That’s what most users do – they see something offensive or objectionable, they mute the user.  I think one exception was lolicon, of which was banned by Gab.  Lolicon is…I think it’s anime drawings that are kind of pedophilic or something.  Some people are super butthurt that lolicon is no longer allowed on Gab.  I can understand banning something like lolicon, and yes, I know that it might not necessarily be illegal, but I can’t blame people for not wanting to accidentally see that.  Plus, I wouldn’t want that found in my browser’s cache.  Just saying.

Anyway, Gab hasn’t been online for a full 24 hours, so it’s a little slow right now.

But, welcome back, Gab.