Browsed by
Category: Politics

Fuck you, Terry Tate

Fuck you, Terry Tate

And anyone else whining and crying about the CNN meme that the media’s been whining about all week.

So you think that meme will incite violence against all the poor widdle reporters that keep lying to us? So, do you dipshits mind explaining this?

How the hell is this any different? Way back in 2008, when McCain and Palin were running for President and Vice President, respectively, on the Republican ticket, some random asshole football player filmed the above in reaction to Palin’s disastrous interview with that lipless bitch Katie Couric. As I said, she was the Vice-Presidential candidate at the time, and therefore under the protection of the Secret Service. Using the media’s logic and standards, this video is absolutely an incitement to commit violence against Palin and possibly anyone that supported her.

Go ahead and watch the controversioal CNN meme for comparison. This isn’t the exact one, but it’s close.

The left is utterly full of shit. Truly. I know I’m late to the game, but I just had to write this.

I’m glad the President tweeted that meme. GOOD. If only Palin or McCain had done something similar in response to that disgusting tackling video. You gotta fight fire with fire.

The tide is changing – slowly (and far too slow for my taste) but it’s changing, thank God.

Happy Independence Day

Happy Independence Day

Happy Independence Day!!! ūüáļūüáłūüáļūüáłūüáļūüáł

A post shared by Elaine Arias (@ema1982) on

I am so tired today. I had to work, and wasn’t too enthusiastic about it. Then I spent the rest of the day at a friend’s house, watching movies and eating hot dogs and turkey burgers (still trying to avoid beef).

I don’t really have much to say right now, because I am so tired, but I did want to mark the occasion. I am, and will probably always be so, so grateful to be an American. To be here, being able to work, to drive (well, in theory; I have no license), to dress however I want, to associate with whomever I want (up to and including having sex with someone without worrying about having my clitoris hacked off or being honor killed), etc.

A couple of days ago I watched a movie called Bitter Harvest, which is about the Holodomor. Josef Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union, couldn’t get Ukraine under control, so what he did was completely cut off their food supply. Many people died of starvation. This wasn’t confirmed until after the fall of the Soviet Union. No matter how ridiculous the left gets, we haven’t gotten to that point yet, thank God.

So yes, I am immensely grateful to be an American, no matter what any snobby European has to say about it. God Bless the USA.

Excellent example of media bias

Excellent example of media bias

So some insane Bernie Sanders supporter shot a bunch of Republican Congressmen.  Did the media and Hollywood shit bricks like they did when St. Gabrielle Giffords was shot?

Spoiler alert:  NO.

I had to work (and God Almighty, I hate my job with the fire and fury of a billion hot blue stars) so I followed the story as much as I could, given the circumstances, and I noticed a few things.

First, you had to pay attention when reading the initial reports. ¬†None of them mentioned the political affiliation of any of the shooting victims. ¬†Instead, the primary target, Rep. Steve Scalise, was described as the House Majority Whip. ¬†Well, that’s true – he¬†is the House Majority Whip. ¬†But he’s also a Republican. ¬†Only political nerds like me – or informed people, at least, would realize that he was a Republican given that he’s the House¬†Majority Whip. ¬†Which party currently enjoys a comfortable majority in both houses of Congress? ¬†The Republicans.

Second thing I noticed was that the background and motives of the shooter was not discussed at all.  Turns out that some witnesses claimed that the shooter asked around about the political affiliation of the Congressmen who were playing baseball that morning.

In case you didn’t know – early this morning, a lone asshole shot up a bunch of Republican Congressmen at a baseball field. ¬†Members of Congress often like to play baseball with one another. On occasion, the Dems and the Repubs will face off against one another in a friendly game.

So anyway, the third thing I noted was that the idiot Governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe, immediately called for more gun control.  This is hardly surprising.  The one thing I do find surprising is how slow St. Gabrielle has been in getting her face out there, calling for all of us to be robbed of our constitutional right to fucking defend ourselves.  But wait, because every idiot actor will be on TV insisting that we all turn our guns in because nobody was ever murdered until guns were invented.

So, fast forward to this afternoon, and it turns out that the shooter was indeed a crazy leftist who wanted to end the Republican party and the Trump presidency.

Now, here’s where we get into the whole media bias thing. ¬†I remember when St. Gabrielle was nearly martyred. ¬†The media literally held Sarah Palin as responsible for the attempted martyring of St. Gabrielle simply because her PAC (political action committee) published a graphic of several congressional districts they felt that should be targeted for a Republican victory – not literal murder. ¬†The media wagged their fingers and wrung their hands in despair over how¬†violent¬† and¬†angry the Tea Party was. ¬†Oh, and how¬†racist the Tea Party was, and how the shooter was¬†totally some crazed tricorn-hat-wearing Tea Partier hellbent on taking out his racist hatred for St. Obama on some poor innocent Democrat congresswoman, and that Sarah Palin was sending him subliminal commands to kill Democrats on sight via her oh-so-awful PAC graphic.

It was fucking ridiculous. ¬†St. Gabrielle didn’t get to die for the cause, but she was severely injured. ¬†She had to give up her seat and her husband dragged her around, propping her up as a Martyr for Gun Control and poster child victim for Right-Wing Gun Violence.

So yeah, the mainstream media demonized the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, the Republican Party and anyone else that dared to disagree with the gun control lobby and Obama in general as violent monsters who were¬†directly responsible for the attempted assassination of a sitting Congresswoman. ¬†Needless to say, I’m still extremely bitter over that.

Fast forward to today. ¬†The left has been staging violent protests ever since November, 2016. ¬†Hollywood actors have routinely either denigrated Trump and his supporters or have outright called for the assassination of the President and his followers (hello Michael Shannon, you fugly sack of shit – come at me, bro!). ¬†Plenty of Democrat politicians have done the same, one even going so far as to state that the only way they’ll get “change” is if the streets run rivers of red hot Republican blood.

Will the media hold any of these people, including themselves responsible for this hideous climate of hate?

Here’s another spoiler alert: ¬†NO. ¬†Not just no, but FUCK NO. ¬† I mean, sure, they allowed us to wreck the fugly Kathy Griffin’s career over her stupid beheading stunt, but they gotta throw us a bone here and there just to maintain the illusion of fairness. ¬†Kathy Griffin was nothing more than a convenient sacrifice so they can say, “see, we police our own!” ¬†It’s bullshit and nobody with two brain cells to rub together should fall for it.

I apologize for the salty language. ¬†I didn’t want to write profanity-laden screeds on this blog, but I’ve had a really bad day today and this issue makes me so angry. ¬†Thank God some of the people at that baseball field had guns, or else the shooter might have gotten far more people. ¬†Furthermore, he appears to have been a lousy shot, which is good.

So you’re probably wondering who this shitstain actually is. ¬†Well, his name was James T. Hodgkinson, and you can view an archive of his Facebook page here. ¬†As you can see, he’s clearly a leftist.

I’ve included a screenshot below, and I’ve saved the actual archive file, in case it’s ever deleted.

berniebros are psychokillers

If this turns out to not be his, I’ll edit this post. ¬†But it’s probably his, and the guy is dead. ¬†I’m sure another nutcase will step in and pick up where he left off, though, and the media will breathlessly support this person because “hate speech” is violent and people who use it must be brutally murdered, or something, because muh feeeeeelings!!!

People these days are self-absorbed

People these days are self-absorbed

I read this article today, entitled “I bake new neighbors bread to welcome them, and they never say hello to me again” and found it incredibly interesting.

The author is about 70 years old. ¬†I am 35. ¬†If someone had welcomed me to a neighborhood in this fashion, I’d be grateful and flattered but would have probably retreated into my own world. ¬†I know that neighborhoods have been like this in the past, but I have never really experienced it. ¬†In my own childhood, I think my parents borrowed stuff from neighbors only a few times. ¬†I was an Air Force brat, so we moved a lot, and that might have something to do with it.

“I grew up in a community where everyone knew everyone. Neighbors shared their trials and tribulations with each other, and if someone was down on his or her luck, the others came to their rescue and offered support. The USA is no longer that country. We are divided and afraid of one another.

I had hoped that when Barack Obama was elected we would not only continue our healing from sad historical periods (slavery, and the hard times of civil unrest), but our nation would also be¬†united, blessed, and even better, for we are all Americans. Instead, it was further divided. The division is worse, tolerance is a forgotten word, and feelings are hurt over nothing. Shocking as it may be, it appears that people now think it is okay to take other people‚Äôs stuff, damage other people‚Äôs property, and even hurt other people physically.”

I don’t think we’re afraid of one another as much as people are just simply self-absorbed and intolerant. ¬†We know leftists hate right-wingers with a flaming, blazing passion. ¬†Most right-wingers just don’t want to deal with their ridiculous hatred. ¬†Of course, leftists will whine about how conservatives supposedly hate people that aren’t like them, but that’s bullshit and they know it. ¬†That might have been true when the author of this article was my age, but it isn’t anymore.

To be perfectly honest, thinking that Obama would “unite” the country upon being elected President was incredibly naive. ¬†He was a divisive asshole, and remained so throughout both of his terms. ¬†The left got emboldened and even more hateful, certainly to the point of staging mass riots over losing a Presidential election.

We conservatives and libertarians are not perfect. ¬†We’ve simply lost patience. ¬†We’ve decided to segregate ourselves from crazed feminists and BLM douchebags and environmentalists and socialists and the ANTIFA assholes.

I agree with the author that this is incredibly sad. ¬†We shouldn’t let politics keep us from associating with one another and we certainly shouldn’t let politics keep us from¬†helping one another. ¬†Unfortunately, I am pretty convinced that a leftist would let me die in the street if they knew I was a registered Republican. ¬†I know I can’t count on them for anything. ¬†The only liberals that will ever care about me are my own family members.

Now, the reason why I might come across as unfriendly is because I have social anxiety disorder. ¬†Getting a loaf of bread as a welcome gift would also stress me out. ¬†Would they expect anything in return? ¬†How often would I have to say “hello” or something? ¬†Yes, for me, those are real concerns. ¬†I don’t like being this way. ¬†I get so stressed out over¬†greeting people because of my anxiety (and my self-consciousness).

So anxiety is my excuse for seeming like a self-absorbed person. ¬†However, I don’t know about everyone else, other than this country being incredibly divided over politics. ¬†It’s sad and worrying. ¬†I truly believe that there will be another civil war in my lifetime, and that it’ll be started by the left, because they hate us¬†that much.

Ooh, look – consequences!

Ooh, look – consequences!

The odious Kathy Griffin decided to pose for a photograph in which she held up a bloody mask designed in the likeness of President Trump. ¬†The backlash was pretty severe – loads of leftists and people on the left and the right denounced it. ¬†Today, CNN decided to terminate the contract they had with her. ¬†She won’t be hosting CNN’s New Year’s Eve show anymore.

This is new. ¬†Ordinarily, this kind of stunt would garner loads of praise for whoever performed it. ¬†Just a couple of months ago that piece of shit Steven Colbert said, on his shitty late night show, that President Trump was Vladimir Putin’s cock-holster (honestly, that’s just projection right there. ¬†He, and pretty much everyone else in Hollywood are all cock-holsters for the DNC, and they know it). ¬†People on the right complained about it, and leftists, including the mainstream media, predictably praised him for it. ¬†Oh, he’s so¬†brave, you see, speaking truth to power and all that. ¬†Nothing bad happened to him, his ratings improved and things are just peachy-keen for him.

Meanwhile, Bill O’Reilly loses his long-running cable night show on Fox News Channel over some¬†allegations of sexual harassment (including claims that he bought the silence of his supposed victims). ¬†Nothing has actually been proven and none of the parties involved have even settled the case, but oh no, advertisers fled the show anyway, so that gave the leftard sons of Murdoch all the reasons they needed to begin the great Conservative Purge. ¬†Fox News is no longer worth watching, save for Hannity and Tucker Carlson.

Oh, and speaking of Hannity. ¬†They decided that since their ouster of O’Reilly worked¬†so well that the third time would be the proverbial charm (the first one being the ouster of Roger Ailes, who basically built the network, after allegations of sexual harassment – he died recently, and liberals all had collective orgasms over it, which is something they do every time a conseravtive dies). ¬†USAA made the big mistake of declaring that they were going to stop advertising on Hannity’s show. ¬†Their customers got mad and started complaining, and then they decided to pull their ads from Rachel Maddow’s stupid crapfest, but their customers were still leaving in droves, so they recently decided to reinstate their ads on Hannity’s show. ¬†So it almost worked, but not this time. ¬†They won’t stop, though.

Look at what they did to Milo Yiannopolis.  Accused the man of being a freaking pedophile when he was, in fact, a victim!  His career and influence was just too great for them, so they had to destroy him.

I’m not going to write up a long list of the people leftists have destroyed (Brendan Eich, Sarah Palin and her whole family, Carrie Prejean – just to name a few). ¬†That might be another post for another day.

I am just utterly delighted that for once, a liberal’s stupid hateful stunt has bitten them in the ass. ¬†Oh, her “career” will recover. ¬†She’s nearly sixty and looks absolutely horrible even with makeup, and looks like a swamp hag without it, but she hates Republicans and Christians, so Hollywood will keep her around. ¬†Just wait a few months. ¬†That being said, this is a rare victory for our side.

Another thing I just have to mention. ¬†I, unlike many of my fellow conservatives, don’t feel that she is guilty of treason or should be thrown in prison for this stupid stunt. ¬†I think it’s doubtful that she would have actually¬†tried to behead the President. ¬†I do believe that she wouldn’t be too busted up if someone had been inspired to behead the President after seeing that image. ¬†But the Secret Service takes this stuff seriously, and I am glad they’re looking into it. ¬†I’m all for free speech. ¬†It’s their right to express their opinions even if it’s odious.

But liberals constantly point out that they support our right to hold the opinions we do and that we have the right to express them, but that there are¬†consequences. ¬†Oh, but those consequences usually take the form of the total ruination of a given conservative’s life. ¬†Like, for example, Aaron and Melissa Klein, the owners of the Oregon bakery¬†Sweet Cakes. ¬†They declined to bake a cake for a lesbian wedding and were fined heavily for it, and also got loads of death threats from disgruntled gay allies because of it. ¬†Yes, liberals think that it’s perfectly okay to send someone death threats because you said something they don’t like. ¬†Consequences, you see.

Well, now Kathy Griffin and her friends know what it’s like to be the Kleins, and they¬†deserve it. ¬†Griffin will recover…the Kleins, in all likelihood, will not. ¬†But for today, I will enjoy the sweet, sweet¬†schadenfreude.

Mention God or the Bible Anywhere, Get Lots of Hatred

Mention God or the Bible Anywhere, Get Lots of Hatred

I was just at a UFO site and someone mentioned God.  The Christian God, that is, and some atheist chimed in, stating that God was the biggest false God ever.

I swear, if you go to any mainstream or non-right wing/non-Christian website and mention God or any aspect of Christianity, some asshole atheist will chime in and denigrate you, God and religion in general. ¬†I am absolutely sick of it. ¬†I should probably talk to my therapist about it because it enrages me like nothing else, but I don’t want to talk politics or religion with, well, anyone that isn’t a close family member (and even among my family members there are some that I just don’t want to discuss politics with. ¬†This is primarily because I am insecure).

I am sure most right-wingers and Christians have noticed this. ¬†Can’t mention any aspect of our religion, no matter how mild, without being hounded and harassed by some disgruntled, hateful atheist.

Why do they keep doing this? ¬†Why do they care if someone on this planet mentioned God? ¬†So? ¬†It’s like these assholes get a rise out of pissing us off. ¬†I, for one, am not interested in “turning the other cheek” – I want to throw their bullshit right back in their face. ¬†I just hate flame wars, which is why I usually avoid¬†saying or¬†writing anything.

And another thing. ¬†I was laughed at on some Trump meme Facebook group for expressing concern that this psychotic, disturbing hatred for Christians will lead to active persecution of Christians in the west, but there are plenty of so-called “elites” who think there’s nothing wrong with persecuting Christians.

I don’t care if you’re an atheist. ¬†I had a crisis of faith a couple of years ago. ¬†I know it’s hard to believe in God sometimes and as I said, I don’t have a problem with most atheists, or anyone else of any other religion.

What I do have a problem with are assholes.  I have a problem with people who go out of their way to offend or hurt religious people.  This is becoming increasingly frequent in the West, and YES, it is scary to me.  YES, I believe that at some point, maybe in fifteen or twenty years, people like me will be physically attacked or worse, rounded up and taken to camps because so many people actively HATE Christians and Christianity.

These atheists never hesitate to insult and demean Christians. ¬†It could be a blog post on some celebrity gossip blog, a comment on Reddit, something on YouTube or even a Christian movie’s iMDB page – there’s always an atheist there to declare that God doesn’t exist, and that Christianity is the cause of all the ills of the world.

What do you think is the next step after that?  The Final Solution.  If Christianity is responsible for all of the ills of the world, what does one do about That Which Causes All The Bad Things?

You get rid of it.

And how do you get rid of it?

Read a fucking history book and get back to me.  I suspect many of you already know the answer.

Gosnell, the most prolific serial killer

Gosnell, the most prolific serial killer


Image Source:  The Ampersand


I just finished the Gosnell book by Ann McElhinney and Phelim McAleer.  I posted a brief review here.  This is especially apt, given that Tomi Lahren, so-called conservative firebrand, is getting a lot of crap for her pro-choice declaration on The View.

As I say in the review, I don’t know how anyone can be pro-abortion after reading the details of the case. ¬†I have also read the grand jury’s report, and I’ve seen the pictures. ¬†I even watched the documentary 3801 Lancaster, of which is currently on Amazon Prime, and can be watched for free if you’re a Prime member.

When I watched that documentary, I was a little irritated at the Planned Parenthood reps, who declared that they were still pro-choice. ¬†Then, after a month or so, I realized that they were incredibly brave to appear in the documentary and express their horror and dismay at the conditions of Gosnell’s clinic. ¬†So yeah, it’s possible to remain pro-choice after studying this case, but I personally cannot. ¬†I never was pro-choice, really. ¬†I hate using that term, to be honest. ¬†I usually label myself anti-abortion, and pro-choicers are pro-abortion in my eyes.

I might do a post on Tomi Lahren, although after finishing the Gosnell book, I just don’t feel like it as much anymore. ¬†It’s such a depressing subject and I’ve already had a really bad day.

Anyhow, one more thing I want to say.  Not only was Gosnell an outright murderer, he was a shockingly incompetent and greedy person.  A great deal of his abortions were totally botched, necessitating the whole neck-snipping thing.  He also clearly got a kick out of snipping the necks of those babies, and keeping their feet as trophies.

And the clinic…look, I’m a crazy cat lady, but even I wouldn’t want to be treated in a clinic overrun with cats. ¬†Precious kitties do not belong in health clinics unless it’s a veterinarian’s office.

Oh, and the government…Gosnell wouldn’t have killed nearly as many babies, nor would his botched procedures have claimed the lives of at least two women if the government had done it’s damn job. ¬†He had unlicensed and completely unqualified people administering medication to the patients, he had no working equipment and was resuing tools that were single-use only. ¬†Some people got venereal diseases after being treated at his clinic.

The defense lawyer’s excuse was, “well, what did you expect? ¬†This was a clinic for poor people!” ¬†So poor people don’t deserve to be treated in a clean clinic with sterilized equipment? ¬†It is possible to run a clean, standards-compliant clinic with qualified, licensed personnel, you know. ¬†That just blew my mind.

Anyway, this post is actually longer than the book review. ¬†Oh well. ¬†It’s a really good book, even if you’ve already read the grand jury report. ¬†This one also covers the trial, and the meeting the authors had with Gosnell. ¬†Good, but harrowing.

A peek into the sordid minds of the so-called elite

A peek into the sordid minds of the so-called elite

Ann Barnhardt is a fearless Catholic warrior. ¬†She’s probably the most consistently devout Christian I have ever seen. ¬†If only I had her strong faith and determination to do what’s right.

She recently went to a restaurant and overheard a conversation amongst a bunch of snooty “elite” douchebags – a German man, an American professor at Columbia University, a Swiss man, a Jewish man and a gay man. ¬†They talked about the New World Order and what they hope to happen in the near future. ¬†Ann managed to document the details of this conversation, although there is no actual¬†transcript of their words. ¬†Still, it’s enlightening:

Part One

There’s some stuff about how nationalism is so HORRIBLE, but I don’t want to bother with that right now. ¬†The first thing that really stood out to me was how utterly hypocritical these progressives really are. ¬†They all talk a good game about respecting women and feminism and so forth, but then have this to say about some Dutch woman speaking at a conference:

They then started talking about the speakers at the conference. ¬†One was a Dutch female law professor. ¬†‚ÄúIs she straight?‚ÄĚ ‚ÄúYeah, she‚Äôs straight. And she expects to be submitted to because of her gender!‚ÄĚ

Okay, so they would have “submitted” to her if she had been a lesbian, but fuck straight women. ¬†Technically, I agree – we shouldn’t agree with or “submit to” anybody because of their gender, but progressives CLEARLY expect the rest of us to submit to the gay man because he’s a victim of those nasty Christians, the black man because he’s a victim of racism, and the woman because she’s a victim of the patriarchy. ¬†In other words, we’re expected to submit to the gay man because he’s gay, the black man because¬†he’s black, and the woman because she’s a woman. ¬†If you do not meet their stringent requirements of Professional Victimhood, however, then fuck you, your opinion is wholly and utterly irrelevant.

Oh, and this next bit:

“The Swiss lawyer, it turns out, also has a private practice. When the Fag started talking about how all ‚Äúprivate law‚ÄĚ is really just a subset of the ‚Äúimperial governmental‚ÄĚ paradigm, and cited ICANN as his example, the Swiss came right out and said that the only possible model is total global control of all trade and businesses. Global Fascism. ¬†He said the ‚Äúbiggest player‚ÄĚ is the ‚ÄúOMNIPOTENT REGULATOR‚ÄĚ, which can be the ‚Äúgood company‚ÄĚ, that is a company that is fully controlled by and submissive to the state, ‚Äúthat is so powerful‚ÄĚ that it becomes the de facto regulator. ¬†His example? ¬†You guessed it: Apple.”

Yeah, that’s fucking scary. ¬†THAT right there is why I am not a globalist. ¬†I’m a nationalist. ¬†I’m not afraid to say it. ¬†Ugh, and I’m typing this on my MacBook Pro while listening to music on my old iPhone 5c (I use an iPhone 6 Plus as my regular phone – as in, the one I take phone calls on).

Just, no. ¬†Global control of all trade and businesses? ¬†Yeah, say goodbye to freedom. ¬†As surely as state rights here in the US are important and wonderful – don’t like the way California is run? ¬†Move to North Dakota! – so is the concept of different nations. ¬†If the world is run the way Germany or Sweden is run, we’re fucked. ¬†There’s nowhere else to go. ¬†If the world were run by Saudi Arabia, we’d be¬†really fucked. ¬†Might as well fucking kill yourself. ¬†I mean, look at Europe – the EU is already a clusterfuck. ¬†You really think that’s gonna work on a global scale? ¬†Spoiler alert: ¬†it won’t. ¬†There are too many distinct cultures in this world and countries like China and Japan aren’t gonna give that up anytime soon.

But these brain dead degenerates will die trying to make their demented dream a reality, all at the expense of everybody else.

Also, here’s some more progressive hypocrisy:

“The Swiss then, in the context of Apple, assured the table that with regards to human rights, ‚Äúthey only do it for the public perception‚ÄĚ. ¬†The point being, since Apple is ‚Äúomnipotent‚ÄĚ, they are their own regulator, and they decide what their human rights regulations will be. ¬†Then the grumpy Columbia professor chimed in: Apple absolutely breaks the law in Asia, but we (the former U.S.) are fine with that, because it is all ‚Äúhandled between friends‚ÄĚ. ¬†Apple is for the ‚Äúgreater good‚ÄĚ ‚Äď that is the globalist-fascist agenda ‚Äď so ‚Äúwhy not let them flex their power?‚ÄĚ”

They just flat out don’t fucking care. ¬†The regulations we Americans are subject to are clearly killing the economy, and yet China can basically do whatever the hell it wants. ¬†Apple, a company hell bent on promoting homosexuality, transgenderism and the eradication of global warming has no problem running factories in China, of which have horrific working conditions. ¬†To be honest, Microsoft isn’t much better. ¬†Most of the major PC manufacturers aren’t much better either.

Furthermore, this is utterly rich coming from these twats.  The left whines and cries all damn day long about how horrible powerful corporations are, and yet these douchenozzles have no problem with Apple being above the law and deciding their own human rights regulations.  Bottom line:  as Ann said, Apple is willing to promote their agenda, so the ends clearly justify the means.

I used to think the hypocrisy argument would work on these assholes. ¬†It clearly worked on Christianity. ¬†Now nobody wants to be a Christian because a) they’re hypocrites, and b) they supposedly hate sex, and it’s obvious that Western society is so obsessed with sex that they’re willing to slaughter innocents to keep the sexual revolution going (abortion).

That’s all I have to say about part one. ¬†I highly recommend reading all three parts in their entirety.

Part Two

So these dillweeds clearly don’t like Trump, which is utterly unsurprising. ¬†The first topic in this part is about the homosexual stating that they don’t need laws from the “periphery.” ¬†So who is the periphery?

“Understand that what he means by ‚Äúperiphery‚ÄĚ is anyone outside of the Boston-New-York-Washington DC metroplex, and the San Francisco-Los Angels corridor, having any say in anything. ¬†Like, VOTING.”

Surprise, surprise. ¬†These coastal elite assholes think we shouldn’t even EXIST. ¬†They hate us so much. I wouldn’t be surprised if they had a plan to murder everyone in Middle America, and people like me, who live in coastal states but don’t conform to their fascist insanity.

Ann is not a Trump supporter, which is okay.  She then goes on to say,

“It is for anyone that they perceive to be ‚Äúbeneath them‚ÄĚ ‚Äď not of the Ivy League law school coastal ¬†elite. ¬†And the truth is, they‚Äôre all trash, and deep down, they know it. ¬†Class is a bearing, a mode of conduct, not a resume, not a designer label, and certainly not a net worth.”

So true. ¬†There’s some stuff about a shadow economy consisting of Facebook, Airbnb and other services, and that trade in goods will be fully centralized, which, as I said, is scary. ¬†Ugh…could you imagine every aspect of your life being dictated to by some faceless bureaucrat a continent away?

The rest of it is about how much these asshats hate Trump, and how they’re gonna take him down. ¬†So how¬†will they take him down?


Remember this. ¬†We must be vigilant. ¬†As far as I know, Trump is the only one, besides members of his cabinet, willing to fight the globalists. ¬†He may be a puppet, he might not be. I don’t know, but for now, I choose to trust that he is who he says he is. ¬†Plus, he drives the left crazy.

Part Three

This one is about the economic future, as well as some stuff about the Oscars. ¬†However, there’s only one thing I want to discuss right now, and it’s this:

“Swiss: ¬†Trump is going to war with Iran.

Table: Sunni states against Trump are sending terrorists.

Swiss: Yes, this is very reassuring. The Germans are encouraging them. Very, very good thing. It is dangerous because the situation is fragile, but overall it is very good…

Fag: Yes, because the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

(I don‚Äôt think it gets any clearer than that, folks. As I have been screeching for years, these people view the Islamic political system as its mercenary army, and are consciously using it to advance their agenda without getting their hands dirty ‚Äď for now.)”

I’ve been saying this to myself for a couple of years now. ¬†I’ve bolded the part I feel the most significant, and Ann obviously felt it was significant too. ¬†THIS, right here, is why the gay community (and, by extension, feminists) are so heavily aligned with Islam and those who practice it. ¬†THIS is why the left uniformly bends over backwards to defend Islam in the¬†face of crystal clear evidence that a great deal of Muslims¬†are bloodthirsty monsters hellbent on killing anyone that isn’t willing to submit. ¬†I hate to state that all Muslims are bloodthirsty monsters, and I actually did not state that, but liberals will accuse me of saying it anyway. ¬†I have no problem with peaceful Muslims willing to leave me in peace. ¬†But if you’re the kind who thinks it’s okay to drench a girl in acid simply because she went to school or looked at a boy, then fuck you. ¬†If you’re the kind who thinks it’s okay to throw gay people off of a rooftop, then fuck you. ¬†If you think it’s okay to kill someone because¬†they drew a picture of your religious figures, then fuck you. ¬†Besides, that’s awfully close to idolatry, you know. ¬†Who should one revere more – an earthly prophet, or Allah? ¬†Seems contradictory to me, and that by trying to avoid idolatry, you actually commit idolatry for losing your damn mind over a drawing.

These leftists¬†are fucking cowards – too cowardly to fucking kill us themselves. ¬†They rely on Muslims to commit genocide wherever they go, so that us, the “undesirables” are dealt with at no financial cost to themselves.

Remember this: ¬†leftists are completely and utterly comfortable with being hypocrites. ¬†They don’t care. ¬†They operate entirely on double-standards. ¬†They’re allowed to be hypocrites, but Republicans and Christians are not.

The ONLY reason leftists support Muslims is this: ¬†they’re counting on Muslims to kill us. ¬†It’s that simple.

There’s a lot of scary stuff in part three too. ¬†As I said, I recommend reading all three parts.

Some libs are finally starting to get it

Some libs are finally starting to get it

I found this op-ed on Gab, entitled “The backlash to political correctness was inevitable“, published by the Toronto Sun. ¬†I mostly agree with it, but I wanted to address some things that irritated me. ¬†(I linked to the mobile version, as the ads on the desktop version are highly annoying).

After addressing the fact that some of our concerns are actually legitimate – some migrants to commit crimes, and aspects of Islam are troubling – the author veers into some leftist stupidity.

“That‚Äôs where anti-immigration politicians such as Trump and Le Pen come in.”

In other words, brushing off the legitimate concerns of some “moderates” gets you anti-immigration politicians like Trump and Le Pen.

First of all, Trump is not anti-immigration. ¬†This is a flat out lie. ¬†For god’s sake, two of his wives were immigrants, his current wife being one of the two! ¬†Nothing Trump has said indicates that he is “anti-immigrant.” ¬†When will you people learn to differentiate between¬†legal immigrants and¬†illegal¬†immigrants?

Oh, never. ¬†Our position is actually a reasonable one, so of course they will never, ever learn the distinction. ¬†It is too politically expedient and easy to accuse your opponents of being xenophobic bigots, rather than actually address our concerns. ¬†Could you people please explain to me why it’s okay for Mexicans and God knows who else to simply cross the border and set up shop here without actually letting our government know they’re here? ¬†Can you explain to me why it’s okay for these people to commit identity theft and fraud in order to gain access to our public welfare programs?

Can you explain to me why it is okay for¬†Canada and Mexico, to name just two other countries, to have far stricter immigration laws and steeper punishments for breaking those laws? ¬†Can you explain to me why New Zealand has such strict criteria for becoming a citizen of their nation? ¬†Why can’t we have such criteria?

All any of us, including Trump, ever wanted was for people to enter our country the proper way, by respecting and following our laws. ¬†Oh, and we’d also like for them to at least¬†respect our culture and not threaten to beat our children if they, or anyone else chooses to prominently display the American flag on May 5.

As for Marine Le Pen, she sounded pretty anti-immigrant to me, wanting to halt¬†all immigration, but I could be wrong about that, and even if I am not, the situation in France is far worse than it is here, and has been for quite some time (back in 2004, I followed French politics because I had a crush on a French polititian [I am embarrassed, okay] and even back then “youths”, or Muslim migrants were burning cars left and right). ¬†I can’t blame her or anyone else in France for wanting to at least temporarily halt all immigration so that they may address the problems they have, and deport the troublemakers.

So at least as far as Trump is concerned, that is such bullshit.  He is not anti-immigrant.  He wants immigrants to obey our laws and assimilate.  That is all.

“Is the threat of radical Muslim immigration to the U.S. so great that it warrants Donald Trump‚Äôs sledgehammer-to-kill-a-fly travel ban? No.”

Actually, I believe it is.  I would know more than some Canadian, because I at least live and work in the US.

Furthermore, that is a gross mischaracterization of Trump’s executive order. ¬†Has this person actually read the executive order? ¬†The so-called “ban” concerns people either born in or coming from seven specific countries, one of them being Syria. ¬†The list on Trump’s executive order was mostly cribbed from a similar order issued by Obama in 2011, I believe. ¬†Trump merely added Syria to the list.

The order does not cover ALL Muslim majority nations on the Earth, and it was TEMPORARY. ¬†The “ban” would have lasted only 90 days! ¬†So no, it isn’t a sledgehammer in the least – it’s more like a Nerf bat. ¬†Jesus.

Despite those two items, the op-ed is actually pretty good, and intelligent coming from a liberal.  Political correctness, the dogma of the left, is under jeopardy and people like the author want to save it, hence this burst of common sense.  Of course, old habits die hard and they cannot help but indulge in a little bit of hyperbole and lies.

The Left Claims Another Scalp

The Left Claims Another Scalp

Milo Yiannopolous’s book¬†Dangerous, originally slated for a March 2017 release, has now been canceled. ¬†His publisher was Simon & Schuster, on the Threshold Editions imprint. ¬†Cucks. ¬†Total cucks, but that is no surprise. ¬†At all.

I also want to note that the release of the book had been pushed to a June 2017 release before its cancellation.  I think that may have been due to Milo wanting to add something about the Berkeley riots.  I had thought it strange and annoying, as I had preordered it and was seriously looking forward to reading it.

I have nothing more right now, as I’m angry. ¬†I shouldn’t be, I guess, but I am. ¬†The media has been accusing him of being things he is not, and this latest charge is just as untrue as the rest. ¬†So all I have is this: