Browsed by
Category: Politics

Funny, you bitches hated him in 2008

Funny, you bitches hated him in 2008

Featured photo from Pexels

These people make me so fucking sick. SO FUCKING SICK.

So Maaaaaaaaaaverick finally kicked the bucket this past week.  My eyes are still quite dry, so that’s all I have to say about that.

And, of course, the bullshit tributes are all over the news.  These assholes weren’t so nice and all, “what a great American!  What a hero!” back in 2008 when he was stupid enough to run against the Almighty Light Bringer and First Black President.

So, predictably, Breitbart and Info Wars just had to report on all the celebricunts that are completely offended over President Trump offering his condolences in the wake of Maaaaaaverick’s passing.  You know, it’s something the President does for every politician.  This is no different.  We know Trump wasn’t much of a fan of McCain but so what?  He’s still classy enough to offer his condolences.  Lefties just can’t stand that, obviously.  Trump would be raked over the coals if he hadn’t said anything at all.

I installed Embedly, so hopefully this will work.

Celebs Trash Trump in Response to John McCain’s Death: ‘F*ck You’

Many stars apparently couldn’t help but use McCain’s passing to whip up more anti-Trump hatred. “John McCain: American patriot, war hero. Donald Trump: Draft-dodging weasel,” wrote author Stephen King. “Take his name out of your mouth you piece of shit. You maligned his military service while you did everything to avoid serving.

Hey, Stephen King…Bill Clinton was a draft-dodger too, you fuckwit!  Funny how you had absolutely no problem with that!

So the article only lists tweets by three celebricunts.  The only one with any real name recognition is Stephen King.  The other two – Kathy Griffin and that fugly asshole Ron Perlman are just random z-listers.  This hardly classifies as “many stars” but the right-wing media loves to report on these loser shitheads and their idiotic takes on politics.  I know, I know – we have to know our enemy and blah blah blah, but I’m sick of it, because it’s just more people that have to go on my boycott list.

Someone should do a search on their Twitter feeds and see what they said about Maaaaaaaaaverick back in 2008 when he dared to challenge Jamie Foxx’s Lord and Savior.  These people are full of shit.  They really are.

EDIT:  I was right!  Twitchy has a story on the things Kathy Griffin said about McCain back in 2008!

Straight-up NASTY! Kathy Griffin’s own FILTHY words about McCain come back to BITE her on the arse

Last night, shortly after John McCain passed away, President Trump did tweet out his condolences to the family. Truth be told, nothing he said or tweeted was going to go over well with everyone (or anyone) but this editor was actually relieved the tweet itself was at least normal.

Maybe that ugly bitch should keep Maaaaverick’s sainted name out of her mouth.  She has less of a right to talk about him than Trump does.

Words mean things

Words mean things

Oxford dictionary definition of racism.  Note that white people vs non-whites is not mentioned.

If you’re a conservative political junkie like me, you’ve probably heard of this heinous bitch named Sarah Jeong. The New York Times – aka Carlos Slim’s shitty little blog – recently hired her to be a tech editor or something. Right-wingers delved into her social media accounts and discovered a shitload of tweets about how much she hates white people, white men, old white men, Christians, and all the other bug-a-boos liberals routinely bitch about.

Unlike Disney, Carlos Slim’s shitty little blog decided that she’s totes amazeballs and that they are totally keeping her on, because she hates all the right people.

Oh, and the mainstream media is pretending that this is a significant victory for the left, because, according to them, we’ve “weaponized” this sort of “get people fired for things they’ve said online” tactic. This is pure projection and they know it. They’ve been doing this shit since 2012 at the earliest. No, even earlier than that. I’d say they’ve been doing it ever since Twitter and Facebook first got really popular.

We right-wingers manage to get one person fired – James Gunn – and all of a sudden this is a nefarious right-wing tactic. It’s utter bullshit.

But of course, we all know why they decided to keep her on. I mean, besides her hating all the right people. According to the left, non-whites cannot be racist. Yes, that’s the new definition of racism — according to them, anyway.

Below is an image I found on the Internet. I’m not even going to bother crediting whoever created this shitty graphic. I didn’t create it, and I’d rather die than take credit for it anyway.

this is not what racism means

So, essentially, the new definition of racism is some nonsense about how non-whites were treated. Also, notice how the creator of this image basically trivialized actual racism from black people. A black girl saying, “like, I hope you die in a fire, whitey!” is totally okay and is just a joke, but if you said the same to the black girl (without calling her a name) – oh, that’s racist.

Technically, neither are really racist but are really rude, but the left loves engaging in bullshit double standards. This new definition of racism is their way of allowing non-whites and leftists in general to be monstrous racists and not get called out on it.

The fact that this new definition is so widely accepted by our government, the entertainment industry and the news media is proof that whites no longer enjoy the “institutional power” they claim they enjoy.

After all, Roseanne Barr made a joke about a specific individual person – that hateful terrorist bitch Valerie Jarrett. One fucking tweet, and no racist slurs were used, and she loses her whole TV show because of it. She’s white, by the way.

But Sarah Jeong gets hired even though her new employers know about her hateful racist history and there’s nothing wrong with that. Not only does she keep her job, they publicly stand by her and their decision to hire her.

That’s far from the only example I can give, either, but I don’t have all day for this.

Check out this idiotic link. They’re clearly butthurt that the definition hasn’t been updated to include “racism is the systematic and deliberate opppression of people of color by white people.”

Or, “racist” means “white person.” That is what these people honestly believe.

We cannot let them change the definition of words. We simply cannot. All this is going to do is make it easier for them to commit genocide against white people. You think I’m exaggerating or being melodramatic. I am not. Just take a look at what they say on Tumblr and Twitter. Technically, this shit is all over the Internet, but you can get a good idea just from those two sites alone.

Anyway, this post at Quillette says it better than I can. Excellent post with good examples of how utterly insane and hypocrtical the left has become.

Remember: don’t let them change the definitions of words.

Happy Independence Day!

Happy Independence Day!

unsplash-logoJohn Silliman

Freedom isn’t free.  And, you cannot be free without being responsible.  This message has been utterly lost on leftists for…well, for a very long time.

One of my biggest pet peeves is the social safety net – welfare, food stamps, WIC vouchers, Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security.  If they all went away, the Democrats would never win another election, because they are clearly using these programs to buy votes.

But the person that feeds you and bestows free, wholly unearned gifts onto you can take them away, if you’re unlucky.  If they don’t take them away, they can impose restrictions on your life as a condition of using those free benefits.  Right now, you can probably buy loads of junk food using food stamps, but that could change, and the government is well within its rights to restrict food stamp purchases to the basic essentials.

Wouldn’t you rather just buy your own food, with your own money?  Then you can eat whatever you want.

But leftists don’t like that, because they’d rather spend their money on frivolous stuff.  They also think that because they need certain things – food, shelter, clothing, medical care – that they have a right to it, and that it’s the government’s job to secure those rights.  Well, as Bill Whittle said a couple  of years ago, these things are commodities.  Someone has to sacrifice their own time and resources to bring these things into being and make them possible.

Being free does not mean you are, or even should, be free from the consequences of your actions.  That’s another thing the left doesn’t understand, and they are very hypocritical about it.  They think Sarah Sanders should be hounded and harassed for the rest of her life simply because she’s President Trump’s press secretary. Or, because, according to them, she “lies” for the Orange Hitler.  They never actually point out his lies or her lies, but they don’t like him, so he must be a liar, period.

They think that we should endure the consequences of our actions, but that they themselves do not, and that if they do end up dealing with the consequences of their actions, that’s “oppression” according to them.

Anyway, enough of that.  I can expand upon this in another entry, this relationship between freedom and responsibility.  I want to talk about how grateful I am to be an American.  Despite my surname, I was indeed born here.  I was born in California, and I’ll be going back there for a family occasion later this month.  The miserable state of California is also fodder for a whole other post.

We Americans are very lucky and fortunate in many respects.  Not that we don’t have our own problems (and boy do I have a LOT of problems right now), but we’re very fortunate.  I can pretty much work where I want.  I can wear what I want.  I can marry whoever I want.  I can say what I want, listen to what I want, read what I want, watch what I want.  I can buy what I want (well, almost…the idea that any guns are banned is just total bullcrap to me).  I can (mostly) associate with whoever I want and do business with whoever I want.  I can also have as many children as my body can handle.  And I can go to school and get a college degree (which I’ve already done).

We women are very lucky.  The US, and other Western nations are among the best places to be if you’re a woman.  It irritates me that feminists constantly whine about stupid shit, like being called a slut or whatever.  Look, if you do something in public, people have the right to say something about it.  You, in turn, have the right to “clap back” or whatever they’re calling it.  That’s the beauty of the First Amendment – the give and take of ideas and such.  Leftists don’t want it that way, though.  Leftists don’t like free speech anymore because eeeeevil “racists” are allowed to spread their evil evilness around and call it free speech.  They want to censor anything they don’t like.

Like the situation with Tommy Robinson.  The courts didn’t like him reporting about the rape gang trials, because his reporting might “taint” the jury and the vile rapists might actually be held accountable for what they’ve done.  So they banned him from reporting outside the courthouse.  He did it anyway, and that was why he was arrested (he’s apparently done this before).

This law, rule, whatever you want to call it is unjust.  But he took his punishment like a man, and unfortunately was sent to a prison with a high Muslim gang population.  He is in solitary confinement, however, for his own safety.  Of course, they didn’t have to send him to that prison anyway, but they’re keeping him around until they feel like letting those Musloids have at it.  It is very worrying.

His situation is one of the zillions of reasons why I’m so grateful to be an American.  I don’t like saying I’m “proud” because pride is a sin, and it’s a sin for good reason.  Not that I have a problem with anyone stating that they’re proud to be an American.  Go for it.  Don’t mind me.  But I feel so strongly about being an American that being “proud” doesn’t adequately describe my feelings.  I’m not wearing anything on my head, save for my glasses and my pink Beats headphones as I listen to Dragonette’s “Darth Vader”.  Thank God.

The only reason why my life is such a mess right now is because of the stupid decisions I’ve made.  Me.  My fault, and no one else’s.  But I can fix those problems, because that’s one of the wonderful things about this country.  The boundless opportunities.

Anyway, God Bless America and all those who live here.

What is wrong with these people?

What is wrong with these people?

Featured image By Marc NL at English Wikipedia (Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons.) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

This is mostly a rhetorical question, but seriously, what is wrong with these people?

I’m sure you know all about the separation-of-families immigration hoax that the media’s been pushing for the past week and a half.  I am not going to debunk it – instead, I will link to two blog posts that do an excellent job of explaining just exactly what is going on and why the media is pushing this bogus story so hard:  Democrats and Media are Lying:  Behind the Phony ‘Family Separation’ Propaganda by Robert Stacy McCain and 13 Facts the Media Pros Don’t Want You To Know About Border Children by John Nolte at Breitbart.

Okay, so, predictably, Hollywood assholes – mostly raging has-beens who desperately need the publicity – have been freaking out over this phony propaganda.  ‘Freaking out’ is putting it very, very, very mildly.

Some ancient, has-been actor (who happens to be the brother of that traitorous hag-bitch commie whore Jane Fonda) has called for the punishment of the President’s young son Barron (hat tip Breitbart):

You may need to click on the picture in order to read it.  But yeah, this is his take on the issue.  Oh, and then he attacks Sarah Sanders:

And then goes after Kristjen Nielsen:

Ms. Nielsen and Ms. Sanders are adults, so as much as I find his comments utterly distasteful and insane, I really can’t say much more about them.  I’ve thought and said a lot of nasty things about leftists I hate, so I’d be a hypocrite to get too angry about it.  But Barron Trump?  He’s a kid!  He’s only eleven years old!  He probably has almost no concept of politics!

But you know why they go after his kid?  They do it to demoralize him.  It’s the same reason these cunts (and that’s precisely what they are, and I am not going to apologize for using strong language) went after Sarah Palin’s son Trig, who has Down’s Syndrome.  Oh, they said all sorts of nasty things about him.  He was just a freaking toddler back in 2008, when Palin ran for VP along with that jerk-wad John McCain (I deeply regret voting for that guy, I really do).  I believe that their goal is to traumatize the targets in question and traumatize the parents in order to scare them into retreating or otherwise capitulating to their demands.  Fortunately, both Palin and Trump are made of sterner stuff, and they – the President in particular – refuse to fall for this nonsense.  In fact, the First Lady has contacted the Secret Service about these insane threats.

So I have another question.  According to Twitter’s own rules, these tweets would be grounds for immediate suspension.  Oh, but Twitter is run by a complete asshole who also happens to be a huge hypocrite.  Therefore, only conservatives, alt-righters and Republicans lose their accounts.  Shitheads like Peter Fonda can call for the violent abuse of a fucking eleven year old kid and he gets to keep his account.  But I get salty with some no-name, pathetic wannabe ‘actress’ and my ass gets permanently banned.  Milo Yiannopoulos gets banned for something he didn’t even do, but these assholes get to merrily post their bullshit all day long and suffer absolutely no consequences.

As for the actual issue itself…I’d rather these ‘families’ be deported as soon as they’re detained.  According to the articles I’ve read about the subject, it seems that these so-called families might not even be separated for that long.  These kids cannot be placed in the same detention centers as adults.  When a minor commits a crime, they generally aren’t processed in regular courts nor are they sent to prisons with adults – they go through juvenile court and are sent to juvenile detention centers except in rare cases when the kid has committed a heinous crime, and then they’re tried as adults.  This wasn’t an issue during the Obama years or even the Bush years.  No, all of a sudden it’s an issue now because the left has been throwing an epic conniption fit for the past year and a half, all because their candidate didn’t win the 2016 election.

Oh, and another thing.  How can we be sure that these ‘families’ are indeed actual families?  These kids may not actually be traveling with their parents.  Even a few years ago I remember reading about parents that would send their kids to the US unaccompanied.  Once it was stated that families claiming asylum would have a greater chance of being let into the US, we started seeing all these kids along with adults.  Random adults could be choosing random kids to claim as their own simply to gain entry into the US.  And if they are truly ‘undocumented’ then there’s no proof as to whether or not they’re related, or what country they’re actually from.  So yeah, verifying their ‘story’ takes time.  That’s why they’re all in detention centers in the first place.  They can’t be, and shouldn’t be let into the country, although that’s precisely what the Democrats and their toadies in Hollywood want.

The Democrats want power, and they’ve decided to get power by gaining more votes.  That’s why they’re so gung-ho about opening our borders wide open.  These people coming over here want access to our insanely generous welfare system.  In exchange for this, they’ll loyally vote Democrat every time.  Get enough of them here, and they’ll outnumber the rest of us, therefore keeping the Democrats in power for decades to come.

I’m tired of them getting away with this crap.  I really am.

History made today

History made today

Photo by Sebastian Voortman from Pexels

I am just thrilled with what just happened today.  I really am.  I am cautiously optimistic about it, and I am very happy that all is well.

Now, if only North Korea could be free.  But these things take time.

Breitbart was kind enough to provide a full text of the document signed by the President and the dictator (heh):  Document Signed by President Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un at Singapore Summit.  Read it and decide for yourself (oh, and be sure to turn on your ad-block.  Never browse the Net without an ad-blocker!).

Still Against Abortion, Regardless of What You Think

Still Against Abortion, Regardless of What You Think

Image Source:  Pixabay

I was browsing around the Internet and somehow found myself on the official website of a South African dance group that I listened to twenty years ago.  Predictably, the female member is totally pro abortion.  The page in question is here, and you’ll have to scroll down to see her comments on abortion, since she doesn’t know how to blog, I guess.

She has a questionnaire for those of us who are pro-life.  I do not call myself pro-life because I am not against the death penalty.  I am strictly anti-abortion, because it is the ending of an innocent life.

Oh, and before she demanded that all pro-lifers answer this questionnaire, she had this to say about abortion:

“I do feel that abortion is the ending of a life, rather than just a medical event. And, I am totally pro free, safe abortion for anyone who asks.

Okay, here is the questionnaire, and my answers.

1) How many ‘unwanted’ children have you adopted?

I have not adopted any children as of yet, because I am not financially capable of caring for a child.  I would like to adopt someday, however.  I feel that this is responsible.  If I were to fall pregnant, I would, however, have the child and I would probably raise the child myself.  Adopting is not like going to the store and purchasing an item.  Adopting in the US is apparently very expensive.  I can barely pay my student loans.  I certainly cannot afford to pay adoption fees.
2) How many children have you fostered?

See previous question.  I am not financially able to care for anyone but myself, unfortunately.  Deliberately fostering a child or adopting a child when I have so much debt would be irresponsible.
3) How many single teenage mothers who are not blood relatives have you taken into your home for a full year or more?

I don’t know any personally. I also don’t own a home, and I live with someone else.  It would be up to them as to whether or not I could take in a single teenage mother.  If I did own a home, I would.  I might not be able to pay for a lot of her expenses, but I’d let her live in my home for a year and try to help her get on her feet, or finish school.
4) How many hours per week do you spend volunteering at a facility for abused/abandoned children?

How many hours per week do you spend volunteering anywhere?  You’re awfully self-righteous.

I work for a living.  That’s my contribution.
5) What percentage of your annual income do you routinely donate to facilities for abused/abandoned children?

What percentage of your annual income do you routinely donate to any facility for anything whatsoever?  Tell me where you’ve volunteered and how much you’ve donated.  And it has to be for abused/abandoned children, not some abortion organization.  If you care so much about children, focus on helping children that are already alive, and stop focusing on killing innocent children.

All of this is irrelevant, because, as you just said, abortion is taking a life.  Absolutely nothing justifies taking a life short of murder.

I don’t like not being financially able to adopt children.  I am not proud of it.  But it’s reality.  I make sure I don’t get pregnant, and I don’t engage in any activity that might result in a pregnancy because right now, I cannot afford kids.  That’s the smart thing to do.  If you can’t afford contraception, you should refrain from any activity that might result in pregnancy.  That’s the smart thing to do.  But feminists like you are not interested in doing the smart thing.  Instead, you think with your cunt.

She finishes off with this:

Unless they can answer at least “one” (or more) to at least one (or more) of these five questions, as far as I am concerned they are not actually ‘pro-life’ but merely pro their own self-righteousness, and would be doing the world a great favour if they just went home and picked their noses instead.”

Sorry, but no.  You don’t get to tell me what to do, unless you’re interested in paying off all my student loans.  Then I might shut up about politics…maybe.  No guarantees.  Besides, I answered them, so therefore I have the right to speak up.

This woman, called Levannah, is just as self-righteous as she thinks pro-lifers are.  Perhaps more.  She expects us all to take in all the orphans of the world, regardless of our ability to actually care for them, simply because she’s fucking hooked on the “make them live up to their own rules” Alinsky tactic.

Besides, these arguments have no bearing on whether or not abortion is bad.  Instead, it’s nothing more than a logical fallacy – an ad hominem attack, an appeal to motive.  Instead of debating the merits of abortion, you attack your opponent.  Your logic is literally as follows:  “abortion must be good because pro-lifers are hypocrites who don’t care about the children we couldn’t kill in the womb.  They don’t care about those children because they don’t adopt all of them.”

But you yourself said that abortion is the taking of a life.  Whether I have adopted children or not does not change the fact that abortion is the taking of a life, nor does it have any impact on the validity of abortion whatsoever.

Plenty of pro-lifers have taken in the so-called ‘unwanted’ of the world.  She’d know that if she did any research whatsoever.

Oh, and one more thing. I used an image of a black baby because black babies are being slaughtered by Planned Parenthood, an organization founded by Margaret Sanger, who was, to put it bluntly, a racist bitch.  There are literally less black people in the United States thanks to Planned Parenthood.  No, I will never, ever, EVER fucking support Planned Parenthood nor will I ever support abortion.

To reiterate:  if you “feel” that abortion is taking a life, then your questions are complete and utter bullshit, and do not justify the taking of that life.  Call me self-righteous all you want.  I’ll just call you a selfish, genocidal murderer because that is precisely what you are.  I’ll take being self-righteous over that any day.

Never Apologize

Never Apologize

Sigh. I’m sure you’ve heard about this perfectly innocuous tweet by Laura Ingraham:

And, of course, Little Shit (that’s what I’m going to call him) lost his mind, got butthurt and whined to his backers at Media Matters to target Laura Ingraham’s advertisers. Her advertisers, grateful for the opportunity to sabotage another conservative and avoid any counterboycotts from right-wingers, quickly folded.

Caving to the pressure, she fucking apologized.

You never apologize to these people. EVER. Has she not learned from Donald Trump? You don’t apologize to liberals, and you certainly don’t apologize for telling the truth!

And I am absolutely not down with these hand-wringing conservatives (more like cuckservatives) boo-hooing about how she shouldn’t have said what hse said. Yes she absolutely fucking should have, because she was right and it was her right to do so. Nobody should have to lose their job over speaking their mind. That is grotesque and flat out wrong.

What she said was incredibly mild compared to what Little Shit has said:

So yeah, looks like Little Shit can dish it but he can’t take it. This is rather distrubing, though. This boycott of Laura Ingraham didn’t come from her stance on gun control (she’s against it, since she’s a conservative and all), but because she mildly taunted his stupid ass about not getting into all of the colleges he applied for. If he didn’t want anyone talking shit about his getting rejected from college, he shouldn’t have posted it on his Twitter feed. You make something public, it becomes fair game. Furthermore, I don’t see him apologizing for the shit he’s said about Marco Rubio, Dana Loesch and all Republicans.

Also, I would have gone further and mentioned that he likely didn’t get into those colleges because he’s white. That would have triggered him and his henchmen even more, which would have been more fun to watch.

Unfortunately, Laura Ingraham bent over and basically begged for punishment by apologizing to Little Shit, who, obviously, didn’t accept her apology because he has no class, manners or character. This is yet another reason why you don’t apologize.

She’s lost over a dozen sponsers for her show, and the left is crowing over this victory. It doesn’t say anything good about them when this stupid kid is so thin-skinned that he wants to ruin someone’s life simply because they said something less than nice.

A note about charity

A note about charity

Photo by Don Selguera from Pexels

Leftists love bitching about Christian hypocrisy.  One of their favorite things to whine about is how we Christians supposedly hate the poor, and refuse to help the poor, even though the Bible commands us to care for the poor, etc.

I am going to start off with 2 Thessalonians 3:10:

IMG_70E809FBF267-1

I love the YouVersion Bible app.  I’ve been using it a while, and I can make nice graphics like the one above.  Anyway, I think this verse is pretty straightforward.  Lazy people who refuse to work will suffer the consequences, and the consequences of that is that they do not eat.  When we conservatives complain about welfare programs and such, we’re not condemning all poor people.  Rather, we’re complaining about the kind of people that stay on welfare, make bad decisions that necessitate their continued reliance on welfare, and their refusal to do anything to get off of welfare.  A lot of people do not pay income tax – however, not all people who pay income tax are billionaires or even millionaires.  Those people making, say, under $500,000 a year are not one-percent high rollers bathing in champagne and driving expensive cars, etc.  They often have plenty of expenses of their own, and here’s the important part:  they work.  They often work pretty hard.  They’re not Mark Zuckerberg/Warren Buffet/Bill Gates/George Soros rich.  Not even Hollywood actor rich.  Their taxes are probably high too, and it’s not just income tax I’m talking about.

I think they have the right to complain.  Furthermore, many leftists seem to think that these people don’t contribute to charity or perform charitable acts.  Many of them do.  In fact, the American people are among the most generous on earth with the amount of money each individual contributes to charity every year (and yes, I’ll give them credit even if they use such contributions as a tax write-off).

I believe that personal, private charity is best.  Leftists don’t, because they think that welfare should be perpetual and eternal.  Yes, they have actually complained that private charity doesn’t last long enough.  That’s the point, though.  It’s not supposed to last your whole life.  It’s supposed to help you get back on your feet.  Welfare, Section 8 housing, WIC, Food Stamps, Medicaid – all of that is designed to “help” a person for life, basically.  Maybe not outright, but many of the people using it find a way to get those benefits for life (and don’t get me started on the illegals committing identity theft and fraud to gain access to those benefits).

The Bible is indeed pretty tough on the “rich” but I believe that when it says “rich” it really means greedy assholes that don’t care about anyone but themselves and their material wealth.  I found Proverbs 29:7 pretty interesting:

IMG_CEA837D42681-1

 

The left believes that we are the wicked that do not care about the poor.  This is flat out false.  We DO care about the poor, but we have different ideas as to what would best help the poor.  Government programs, in my opinion, do not do much to help the poor.  The programs the left loves so much enable people and are impersonal.

It’s better to serve in a soup kitchen, serving meals (or even making them) for the homeless than to vote Democrat and go, “well, this person will keep the Food Stamps program coming.”  Does the leftist in question spend any additional time thinking about the nameless and faceless people his vote supposedly helps?  No, but the person serving in the soup kitchen can look at the people they’re helping.  They can greet the person as they serve them a meal, ask them how they’re doing, and ask if there’s anything else they can do for that person.  This is what those Jesus Freaks they despise so much do all the time.

For most leftists, it’s pretty obvious that all they do is vote Democrat, and that’s where their “charity” ends.  The only other charitable groups they donate to or spend time with are leftist pet projects, like gay rights, trans rights, abortion rights, racist nonsense like Black Lives Matter and anything else that will promote the Democrat agenda.  None of those “charitable” groups have anything to do with helping anyone other than Democrats and their endless quest for power and control.

Of course, I might get whiny comments from leftists saying that they DO indeed volunteer in soup kitchens and homeless shelters and such, but so what?  They clearly didn’t give us Christians the benefit of the doubt.  Or rather, us Christian Republicans.  It’s not nice, is it, when people make sweeping generalizations of you?  Now you know how I feel.

As I said, Republicans do not hate the poor.  We don’t appreciate lazy people, and we have different ideas on helping the poor.  We expect that everyone, even the poor, take responsibility for their own lives.  That, after all, is part and parcel of freedom, which is something we dearly cherish.

Islamic Terrorism Is Real, Just So You Know

Islamic Terrorism Is Real, Just So You Know

So, according to the left, Islamic terrorism isn’t real. Or acknowledging it is Islamo-hatred or Islamophobia.

This wretched slop of shit hosted at the Daily Beast (I used an archive link, so they don’t get any revenue, and in case the piece is deleted) accuses Pamela Geller of being an Islam-hating beeotch, or something, and takes great pains to inform you of her social-media darling daughters.

I had no idea she even had daughters. Yes, apparently her daughters are all very active on social media (mostly Instagram) and are pretty successful…and none of them even so much as mention their connection to Pamela Geller in passing. Her daughters avoid mentioning any association with her, and they never appear with her in pictures.

The author of that stupid post obviously wants to believe it’s because the girls are embarrassed to have Pamela Geller for a mother, and that they vehemently disagree with her politics. Then the author cites the handful of political posts the girls have made, and it’s pretty obvious that they’re at least moderately right-wing.

Interestingly enough, the author never mentions this one simple fact: Pamela Geller, regardless of how you feel about her activism, has gotten death threats for the things she’s said and done. I don’t care what you think of her politics – she does not deserve death threats, and she’s gotten plenty of them. She even wrote a book about it – it’s called Fatwa: Hunted in America and was published by Milo Yiannopolous’s Dangerous Books.

So it’s no surprise that Geller and her daughters avoid associating with each other in public. If anything, it might very well have been Geller’s idea, if only to protect her daughters from getting death threats, or god forbid being kidnapped by ISIS and tortured or killed for propaganda purposes.

I bet the bitch hag author knows this, and decided to publish the names and account handles of Geller’s daughters solely so some ISIS bastard can kidnap one of them and teach that Islam-hating Geller a lesson or two. That’s how these scumbags roll, after all.

Oh, and it gets worse. According to Fox News, they lost the online talk show they used to have. And, predictably, the scumbag leftists have been harassing them on Twitter and Instagram. You can see some of the tweets at Breitbart. Why the left gets to pull this shit and get away with it is utterly beyond me. It also makes me so fucking angry.

The Biggest Misconceptions about Republicans and the Right

The Biggest Misconceptions about Republicans and the Right

pexels-photo-306765

Okay, I am sick of the media and other leftists lying about the Right, so I am here to set the record straight.

We’re anti-immigration

It really depends on who you’re talking to. There’s some within the alt-right that want all immigration halted. There’s neocon dweebies within the Republican establishment that want open borders and amnesty simply because they like the cheap labor.

However, the vast majority of us are strictly against what is called illegal immigration. If you overstay your visa, you’ve illegally immigrated to this country. If you crossed into the border from Mexico or Canada without beginning the process (which starts by submitting a petition to our government) then you are an illegal immigrant.

However, if you’ve done the immigration process and took your oath to become a citizen, we have no problem with you. You cannot be deported because you are a citizen. Only those that remain in this country without a valid visa, green card or actual citizenship are the ones that would get deported.

The media loves to conflate legal immigrants with illegal immigrants, and this is because it serves the whole “Republicans are bigots” narrative. No, we aren’t bigots. We just don’t appreciate arrogant, entitled lawbreakers living in our country.

We’re racist

No, we aren’t. Yes, most Republicans are white. So what? Statistically, that will always be the case simply because whites are still the majority race in this country. That does not mean that all whites or even a sizable majority of whites are racist. That, in and of itself, is racist.

Yes, black, Asian, Hispanic and other non-white Republicans exist. I am one of them. I’ve been a Republican all my adult life. I am not voting against my best interests because the Democrats have absolutely nothing to offer me. My interests include a strong national defense, a healthy and prosperous economy, small, efficient government and lots of personal liberty combined with personal responsibility. I have no interest in living on welfare, in Section 8 housing or feeding myself using food stamps. I don’t need reparations from white people. I do not need to be protected from white people. I do not need nor do I want affirmative action. I do not need the government to address any grievances I have because I’m a big girl who can take care of herself.

It’s interesting how the left attacks us for wanting to either reform entitlement programs, believing that we only want to do so because we’re racist (since, according to their logic, blacks and Hispanics use those programs more than anybody), and yet on occasion, they love to point out to us that a lot of white people use those programs too.

The race and ethnicity of the people using those programs is irrelevant. If they become too expensive or ineffective, they either must be reformed or they must be scrapped. That has nothing to do with wanting brown people to starve.

There are a handful of people on the Right – mostly alt-righters – who do have nothing but contempt for blacks and Hispanics (usually citing genetics, crime rates and average IQ), but they are hardly the majority.

We hate women

No, we do not. We don’t like feminazis. Or militant feminists, if you prefer. We don’t like the kind of feminists that blame all men for all the ills of the world. We don’t like unrealistic portrayals of women (please. A woman, no matter how tall and muscular, cannot go all kung-fu on a group of men. Just, no.) We don’t like man haters.

Furthermore, not all Republicans think women should remain eternally barefoot and pregnant. Some – in fact, many Republicans will tell you that a mother is better off staying home and taking care of their children, and they’ll usually cite a lot of statistics at you to back up their beliefs. That doesn’t mean they think women are somehow inferior to men – they believe that a mother’s nurturing nature is important for the raising of children.

Some Republican women, however, do work, even if they have children. My mother was one of them. She worked throughout my childhood and through most of my adulthood until she got sick. When my baby brother (who is now a teen; he’ll be sixteen this year. Time really flies by) was born, she took time off from work to care for him while he was an infant, then went back to work and then eventually had to go on disability once her health deteriorated. She is now trying to get back to work.

But yeah, plenty of Republican women work. Some do it because they like to, and some work out of necessity. We Republicans believe that it’s okay for a woman to work, and that it’s okay for a woman to stay home. It’s a choice every family has to make for themselves. None of us advocate making it illegal for a woman to work.

I work. I do not have children and I am not married, so I have to work. If and when I get married, I might, or I might not. I am grateful that I have the opportunity and right to decide.

I do not label myself a feminist because I believe abortion is abhorrent and evil. There are some Republican women who are pro-choice, but most of us are pro-life. I simply call myself anti-abortion because I have no problem with the death penalty.

Speaking of abortion…

We hate abortion because we want to punish women for liking sex

Um, no. NO. You’d think that, wouldn’t you? Abortion ends a life – it kills a human being at the most vulnerable stage of life. We hate abortion because it’s wrong. We see it as murder and there’s a lot of scientific data to support our position.

We do not hold this position in order to control women or punish women.

We want to restrict access to contraception or ban it outright

Okay, no Republican has ever wanted to ban contraception – certainly not within the past twenty years.

Expecting you to pay for something is not “restricting” or “denying” access. So, if I expect you to pay for a MacBook Pro am I denying you access to a MacBook Pro? How is that any different from contraception? And if you’re going to say “it’s because I need birth control pills and can’t afford them” I’m going to reply, “well, you need food and water far more than you need birth control pills, so why aren’t you whining about being expected to pay for apples at Walmart is tantamount to being denied access to healthy food?”

One of my biggest problems with Obamacare was the HHS mandate that contraception had to be covered. In fact, a lot of stupid stuff was mandated for every single plan sold through the marketplace, which drove up premium costs. A single man should not have to pay for contraceptions or maternity care, especially for the latter. But under Obamacare, he has to. It’s utterly ludicrous.

You cannot call yourself a fierce, independent woman whilst depending on total strangers to subsidize your sex life. You simply can’t. I don’t want to subsidize your contraception. I do not believe that other people should be forced to subsidize your contraception, especially if they believe that contraception is bad.

We’re anti-science

For the trillionth time, NO WE AREN’T. First of all, stop acting as if climate change/global warming/global cooling/catastrophe that we need to use to scare people into paying more taxes or whatever the hell they’re calling it this week constitutes the entirety of science, because it doesn’t.

It’s cute how it’s gone from global warming to climate change. Kind of like how abortion is magically transformed into “reproductive rights” or “women’s health” and such. The whole “Republicans don’t believe in climate change” is a straw man so that leftists can crow “see, conservatives are STUPID because they deny science!”

We never said that climate change isn’t happening. We said, at first, that there was no scientific evidence to prove that human activity was making the planet get hotter. Now we’re saying that there’s no scientific evidence to prove that human activity is causing the climate to change. The climate will change regardless, and we have little to no control over it. It’s changed before and it will change again until our planet is destroyed (probably by our sun swelling up into a red giant – Mercury, Venus and Earth will simply be in the way, and we’ll be swallowed up or torn into pieces).

Our stance on climate change doesn’t mean that we hate the environment or animals. In fact, I personally hate littering. I hate seeing garbage along the highway or in parking lots or anywhere else, really. I abhor littering so much that I’d rather stuff my napkins in my purse or pocket than drop it on the ground. I bet a great deal of these stupid climate change alarmists aren’t that dedicated to avoiding litter.

Furthermore, I love science (and history). I love astronomy in particular. I love reading about planets, stars, galaxies, black holes, dark matter, quasars, pulsars, novas and supernovas. It’s fascinating. I even like reading about evolution on occasion, and how fascinating it is that humans and animals have evolved thanks to our environment.

But the climate change thing…if you look really hard, and get past all the bullshit propaganda, you’ll find that there isn’t really that much to worry about. The planet is not dramatically warming up. We aren’t going to become Venus anytime soon.

Even if this were true, where are the solutions? Surely someone would have come up with something by now, but the only solution is to tax wealthy countries in the West to financially compensate third-world countries. If we haven’t found the Great Solution to climate change, what makes you think that extra money will suddenly enable these third-world countries to prepare themselves for the supposed calamity?

And why haven’t Hollywood actors started living as if the Great Calamity is going to happen tomorrow? They spew lots of carbon dioxide. They probably use hundreds of gallons of water each month, they probably wear leather, they drive ordinary gas guzzlers, they eat meat, and they have multiple homes all over the world that use shitloads of electricity, yet, ZOMG WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE TOMORROW!!!

You know those televangelists you keep rolling your eyes at? You know, the ones like Jack Van Impe, who keep predicting doom that only Jesus Christ can save you from? Yeah, that’s how I view Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio. A bunch of Jerry Falwells and Jack Van Impes all over the TV, begging us to send some money so they can keep preaching the Gospel. And, to be honest, I have a hell of a lot more respect for televangelists than I do these lousy environmental hypocrites.

Your Enviro-preachers don’t even take their own message seriously. Why should I, or anyone else for that matter? And if you’re going to say, “well, the message is just that important!” Then I will say, “Well, Jesus Christ still died on the cross for your sins. It doesn’t matter if Catholic priests molestsed children and it doesn’t matter if Jim Bakker fucked some secretary while still married to Tammy and preaching the Gospel on TV. Jesus didn’t do any of those things, so their actions don’t invalidate His message.”

But you won’t become a Christian nor will you ever show any respect and common decency to Christians, but you’ll still expect me and everyone else to give up our money and liberty to fight climate change. That makes you a hypocrite.