Elaine Arias

So I’m gonna have to get a copy of Red Dead Redemption 2, because you can kill feminazis in it.  This is according to Vice.  Vice is donkey shit, just so you know.

‘Red Dead Redemption 2’ Players Are Excited to Kill Feminists in the Game

Rockstar Games included a historically accurate portrayal of women fighting for their right to vote, and players are making the worst of it.

Archive link so you don’t get donkey shit on your computer.

But I remember some shitty games from a few years ago, where you could kill tea partiers and stuff.  Funny how Vice didn’t go in rage mode when this shitty game was released:

Gamescom: Shoot Racist Tea Partiers in ‘Battlefield Hardline’ | Breitbart

In the upcoming first-person shooter Battlefield Hardline, players will shoot and kill racist anti-government Tea Party types, Gadsden flag and all.Gamers |

This was from 2014.

And how about this game from 2011, called Tea Party Zombies Must Die.  Real subtle, fuckers:

In new game, Tea Partiers make “zombie” targets

“Tea Party Zombies Must Die,” an online video game, features prominent Tea Party figures as targets.

Oh, but killing suffragettes is just so awful!  Look, I’m glad I have the right to vote (I voted early, and a straight Republican ticket because fuck the Democrats) and the suffragettes weren’t that bad, but I bet the ones in this game are probably super obnoxious feminazis.  I just hate the double standard.

In 2016 a game called Stump the Trump was released in which you could kill Trump.  Of course, a game where you can kill Pelosi or whoever is just super bad and wrong, of course.

You Can Brutally Kill Donald Trump In A New Video Game. Progressive Outrage Nowhere To Be Found. | Breitbart

A new browser-based game, “Stump The Trump” allows you to kill Republican frontrunner Donald Trump by dropping a large tree stump on him. His death is |

By the way, that game looks like utter dogshit.

I wrote about Far Cry 5, but it turns out that the game isn’t a “kill Republicans” simulator, and the left was super butthurt about it.

No, Far Cry 5 Isn’t About “Fighting Trump Supporters” – Mandatory

Many have made comparisons between Far Cry 5 and current US politics.

I still have no real desire to play that game, though.

Wolfenstein II conflated Nazis with Trump supporters.

Nazi-killing video game “Wolfenstein II” angers Nazis with ‘Make America Nazi-Free Again’ slogans

A portion of the internet is upset because a game promotes killing virtual Nazis in a virtual America with a play on Trump’s slogan.

Newsweek does the same thing. Newsweek is also dogshit.  Here’s an archive link in case you don’t want to give them any hits.

Rosie O’Donnell promotes a game in which you can push Trump off a cliff (must be some shitty Flash ‘game’ hosted on some random website, because the gameplay sounds nonexistent):

Rosie O’Donnell sparks outrage with Trump-killing game

Conservatives were not amused.

But if I were to make a game in which you push some stupid leftist asshole off of a cliff and straight into a running meat grinder…ooh, that’s violent and disturbing and problematic. 

People Are Excited to Kill Republican White Men in Far Cry 5

One particular teaser for Far Cry 5 is its poster which showcases a group of white people with an American flag and are most probably the bad guys.

This shitty website also seems gleeful that you might have gotten to kill “Republican White Men” in Far Cry 5, and probably got mega butthurt when that wasn’t quite the case.  See, that’s okay.  Not disturbing at all, but shoot some fucking suffragettes, and you’re evil incarnate.

Okay, so you’re probably wondering what the fuss is all about?  So, I haven’t played the Red Dead Redemption series, but I watched the infamous video in question and it appears that yes, you can kill a suffragette character in the game, but it’s considered a crime in the game world.  If you do it in front of witnesses, you incur a bounty that increases over time.  You know, like in most open world RPG games.  I am such a raging goody-two-shoes in these kinds of games.  I don’t commit any crimes if I don’t absolutely have to, and yet I’d do it just to shut that irritating nag up.

The game’s interface looks a lot like that of Horizon Zero Dawn, a game I’m currently playing (one I enjoy, even though it’s got some lefty crap like most games).  I want this game even more now.

So here’s the video in question.  There’s others, but this one is what got the poor widdle feminazis all in a tizzy.  It’s fine to take a chainsaw to zombie Sarah Palin, but feeding some annoying suffragette to an alligator?  Perish the thought!

I thought it was hilarious.  Kind of disturbing, but hilarious, and all the more because leftist are so offended by it.  Also, the suffragette is really annoying and her reasons for wanting the vote are rather modern.  She goes on about how letting women vote would be an end to wars and stuff, and how women would do it better, and that they might even have a woman president.  Ugh.

Oh, and in the leftist games above, the whole point is to actually kill Republicans/Trump/Tea Partiers.  This is just one gamer killing one NPC, and the game pretty much punishes you for it.  Or attempts to.  The leftist games are much worse, obviously.  Yet Vice probably had no qualms about those games.

So, I know what I want for Christmas.

Oh, it’s Banned Books Week…I think.  Or was that last week?  Well, it’s in September, and as of this writing, it’s September, so I’m just going to link to last year’s post on the matter.

So, get ready to show your kids how wonderful books like Fifty Shades of Gray are.  Or, perhaps, you might like a classic of the genre – like Shirley Conran’s Lace?  Raunchy fun for the whole family!  That’s what Banned Books Week is really about.  You could try handing your kid a book by Michelle Malkin, or Mark Levin, or Ann Coulter.  I am sure their books have been banned at libraries for being “mean” or something.

But no.  Pick the raunchiest book you can find in Amazon’s Erotica section and hand that to your kids, cuz muh freedom.

This Book Banning Hogwash

NPR has released a hit piece on Alt-Hero, Vox Day’s comic book series.  A bit of brief history:  ever since the success of the Marvel-based superhero movies (collectively known as the Marvel Cinematic Universe), comic books have had a bit of a renaissance.  Unfortunately, just as comic books have received this surge of attention, they’ve all been severely converged by social justice warriors.  This has been a problem for a few years now, and disgruntled comic book fans on both sides of the aisle (but mostly on the right) have been clamoring for comics that have not been infested with leftist propaganda.

So, like any intelligent businessman, Vox Day saw an opportunity.  After all, he wrote not one, but two books on dealing with SJWs, and I am sure nothing would please him more than beating them at their own game:  hence, Alt-Hero.  For a crowd-funded indie comic series, it’s doing pretty well.  Of course, it’s no DC or Marvel, but few really are.

Now the leftists are screeching and howling with rage over the fact that right-wingers, including alt-right people, are not only walking away from their bullshit, but are actively competing with them.  And that simply cannot do, so they called in their goons from the Ministry of Propaganda – in this case, the snooty public access talk radio division – to fight back.  And they do, in the most predictable fashion.

You can listen to the segment here, but I just recommend skimming the transcript, of which you’ll find at the bottom of the page.  It’s cancerous cringe, it really is.  I am not going to fisk the entire transcript, but I am going to comment on a few bits I found interesting.

…

Read More Read More

Okay, so I should have done more research on Mastodon. It’s a fascinating network, of which is called a Fediverse, and is made up of multiple servers called instances. The content posted on the instances within the Fediverse are all brought together, making it a decentralized version of Twitter.

It is also a very, very far-left dominated network. So far-left that Wil Wheaton, douchebag extraordinaire, was hounded there for being anti-trans and anti-LGBT (even though he is neither) and was eventually suspended there.

This was after he left Twitter for being full of hate and because Twitter still hasn’t banned Alex Jones.

He claims he has never endured such raging vitriol before in his life.

Well, Willy…WELCOME TO OUR WORLD, DOUCHENOZZLE!

That’s life on a regular basis for a conservative. You know, those horrible people that voted for President Shitler, as you call him. That’s us, every fucking day. He can dish it, but he clearly can’t take it.

People over at Mastodon shouldn’t have spread that lie, and they shouldn’t have harassed him like that, but I don’t really feel all that bad for him. Oh well. He won’t stop being a raging asshole to conservatives. He’ll continue to sail along through life, insulated from the misery we endure not by his skin color, but by his political affiliation. Yes, he is privileged because he’s a leftist. He’s privileged because he is a feminist. And for the first time in his life, he’s run into people much more pure than he is. WOW.

If being amused by this makes me a bad person, so be it. My well of sympathy is nearly dry. I am absolutely sick of people lying about conservatives, Republicans, libertarians and alt-righters.

You can read more about this issue here.

Featured image from Pexels

2nd EDIT:  I noticed some broken images and I corrected my spelling of Netania’s name.  Oh, and something I missed – she isn’t a Trump supporter, but doesn’t have the same irrational hatred for him that liberals, including Sebastian Stan himself, have for the Bad Orange Man.

Remember kids, Orange Man Bad!

EDIT:  Turns out that the Instagram post I embedded did not have his comment.  I have updated the post to show the one that does, but there’s 600+ comments as of this edit, and I still don’t have time to find it.

So I have had a huge crush on the actor Sebastian Stan. I was looking him up on Tumblr when I discovered something that I found a little interesting.

Now the comment by itself wouldn’t be so bad, but it was what the Tumblrina said that kind of worried me. I thought to myself, “Oh god, he’s not another one of those psycho nutjob leftist like his buddy and Captain America co-star Chris Evans, is he?”

Well, not quite. But this whole thing kind of stank, given the language of the Tumblrina and all.  Check it out below:

So, his personal assistant, Netania Cortell is, according to his (crazy SJW) fans, a racist and an Islamophobe, based on what she posted to her personal Facebook page.

I found the screenshots of her apparent evilness and while yes, she seemed pretty conservative and is – or was – not apologetic about it, she was not racist or even “Islamphobic” and I’ll get into that in a minute.

But, as you can see, his crazy assed fans brought it to his attention and basically smeared him as a racist too, simply because he didn’t fire her fast enough or didn’t speak out quickly enough. He’s probably still doing press for the digital release of Avengers: Infinity War, depending on when this happened, so of course, he can’t get to it right away.

But here’s one post another Tumblrina made, basically smearing him as a racist simply because A) he associated with a wretched Trump supporter, and B) he’s white, and therefore cannot be trusted.

I am going to paste the entire post, and bold the insane parts (well, all of it is insane, but this is especially insane):

“I have been trying to stan the guy since I joined the Marvel fandom and for a long time, I thought he was, at the very least, a relatively unproblematic guy. I loved Bucky Barnes, I loved the Cap movies, and fuck, I thought Sebastian Stan was super hot. I should have known better to put a white man on any kind of pedestal. I was disappointed originally, but now I’m just angry. Because he knows what’s up now. There is absolutely no way he doesn’t know. And based on the overall silence and attempts to “distract” his fanbase, he doesn’t seem keen on addressing the issue. For all the people telling me that he’s not the one that’s racist, I don’t care. If he’s friends with and choosing to employ someone who is openly Islamophobic, then he is too by association. You have to be in an insane place of privilege to not care about the values of people who work for you when those values are at the expense of entire communities of people. It’s insulting to his fans to keep her around, knowing that his fanbase largely consists of poc with various religious backgrounds, namely Muslim people. For those of you telling me “he can’t just fire her right now/he needs her/he’s busy working”, I’m not really buying it. I’ll give it to you that maybe there are some contractual things that I’m not aware about that may stop him from firing her right away, idk. But don’t tell me she’s invaluable because, quite frankly, she’s not. Also working is not an excuse. Addressing things like this is part of his job. Stop coddling him; he’s a grown man with responsibilities to his fanbase, the people that allow him to continue to work. That being said, I’m still maybe naively giving him the benefit of the doubt and waiting for him to do something. If he ignores it, if he continues to employ her, I no longer feel comfortable running a Sebastian Stan blog.”

Original Post | Archive

The bit about him being white and not putting white people on a pedestal…that’s just insane.  First of all, why put any of these people on a pedestal?  They’re just human, like the rest of us. How can he even want people like that as his fans? His skin color has nothing to do with anything. He’s not even American for fuck’s sake! He was born in Romania and came to the US when he was twelve! No, he nor his ancestors had anything to do with slavery you morons!

I obviously don’t know him, but I think it’s kind of sad he fired someone he knew and worked with so closely for so long. Thing is, if he wanted to keep his career, he had no choice. Once the mob found her Facebook posts and started posting them around, it was either fire her and denounce her or be blacklisted in Hollywood. Those cunts would have made sure of that.

So, who’s got power again? It certainly isn’t any Trump supporter. Not when you can lose your job over speaking your fucking mind.

I believe this is the post that contained his comment and a buttload of salty fangirl tears. As of this writing, there’s over six hundred comments. I’m not going through all of them. Life is too short, but here it is if you want to take a crack at it.  I believe his response is in there somewhere.

View this post on Instagram

As a muslim myself, im pissed. Its been 3 days. Netania needs to own up to her actions. Reposted from @bbabybbarnes – Written by @slytherdoravenger – – – [[#buckybarnes #captainamerica #infinitywar #thor #avengers #spiderman #loki #ironman #tomholland #tonystark #marvel #robertdowneyjr #sebastianstan #hulk #chrisevans #steverogers #peterparker #avengersinfinitywar #blackpanther #thanos #chrishemsworth #wintersoldier #blackwidow #bucky #guardiansofthegalaxy #memes #mcu #doctorstrange #hawkeye #infintywar]

A post shared by @ buckysplum_ on Aug 28, 2018 at 7:53am PDT

Now, let’s examine the evidence.  I got these screenshots from here (archive).

…

Read More Read More

To be honest, I can’t really laugh at this.  So, the director of the film Desire has gone on record defending the scene, claiming that the mothers of the two actresses were on set when it was filmed, and that the girls didn’t know what they were doing, exactly.  There is even, supposedly, a “making of” program showing how the scene was filmed.

I had wanted to bring this up in the earlier post, but didn’t want to edit it, as I’d have to edit the Medium post too, and I’m lazy.  I am not proud of that.  Perhaps it worked out for the best.

This is the director’s statement, copied from Variety’s article:

““Despair” is a film. When we see a shark eating a woman on film, no one thinks the woman really died or that the shark was real. We work in a world of fiction; and, for me, before being a director comes being a father.

Of course this scene was filmed using a trick, which was that the girls were copying a cowboy scene from a film by John Ford. The girls never understood what they were doing, they were just copying what they were seeing on the screen. No adult interacted with the girls, other than the child acting coach. Everything was done under the careful surveillance of the girls’ mothers. Because I knew this scene might cause some controversy at some point, there is “Making Of” footage of the filming of the entire scene.

Everything works inside the spectators’ heads, and how you think this scene was filmed will depend on your level of depravity.”

Oh, so WE’RE the depraved ones!  You have a little girl riding a pillow in a very, very sexual manner and we’re depraved for pointing it out?  Why the fuck is this scene in the film anyway, if you’re so fucking virtuous?

And pardon me, but I think this guy is full of shit.  How do we know the girls were ignorant of what they’re doing?  I am not about to track down the “making of” feature for this film, because I don’t even want to watch that.

I also love how Variety just had to point out that Megan Fox, one of the first to report this issue, is a “conservative” commentator.

Anyway, it doesn’t matter if they knew what they were doing or not.  The fact remains is that the director coached them into doing this, and filmed it.  Even more horrifying – their mothers allegedly watched this happen and said nothing.  A lot of sexually abused children end up doing stuff while not understanding what it is they’re doing.  That doesn’t absolve the abusers.

Netflix isn’t doing anything, and the mainstream media is still largely ignoring the issue.  Of course.

Since the r/pizzagate subreddit was banned, people have moved over to Voat.  There’s some interesting discussion in two different threads:

Diego Kaplan defending Netflix and his film ‘Desire’
Netflix under investigation for streaming disturbing child pornography scenes

This has been a story for a couple of days, and it has gone just as you would expect it to have gone. Leftists ignore it, and those that don’t ignore it (a tiny minority) claim that there’s nothing wrong with it. People who call themselves right-wingers are saying that this is a nothingburger, and that we’re all a bunch of hopeless prudes, because children are sexual beings, doncha know?

I am, of course, talking about a film called Desire. It is available on Netflix for US users. Allegedly, the film’s opening scene depicts a very young girl — ten or eleven years old — riding a pillow as if it were a horse, and having an orgasm, of which sparks concern in her sister, who calls for her mother. In context, it’s supposed to be the depiction of a girl’s very first orgasm, it’s supposed to be “accidental” and is there for comic relief.

Even in this context, this scene is flat out disgusting. Sure, there’s probably worse, but we can’t brush this off simply because there’s worse. Uh, that’s a problem. A huge problem. If people had raised a fuss when these worse films were released, perhaps there wouldn’t be a problem today. But no, none of you perverted clowns breathed a word about films like Pretty Baby and Blue Lagoon, presumably because you didn’t want to be labeled a prude. As if there were something bad about being a prude. I’ve never understood that. I’d rather be a prude than a whore. Prudes generally don’t have STDs. I’m not interested in having gonorrhea or syphilis.

So, this film is called Desire in the US, and its original title is Desearás al hombre de tu hermana. It is from Argentina, and these Central and South American countries (including Mexico) seem to be more…comfortable with very young children being sexualized. The synopsis is pretty simple:

“Lucía and Ofelia, two sisters, finally meet after 7 years at Lucia’s wedding. But when Juan, Lucia’s husband, and Ofelia meet, they feel like a disruptive fantasy have enchanted their minds and bodies…”

I tried looking for the names and profiles of the actresses that played the young sisters in the infamous scene, and they aren’t listed on the IMdb page.

This reminds me of another film I watched a few years ago, called Towelhead. It is a film about some girl from the Middle East moving in with her father (who is from the Middle East; her mother is white and they’re divorced). She ends up having a very disturbing and abusive relationship with the US Army soldier living on her street. In one scene, she’s in the soldier’s house (she is kind of friends with his son, I think) and ends up looking at his porn collection. She fantasizes about being the girls she sees in his nudie magazines; she crosses her legs and moves in such a way that she ends up stimulating herself, and has an orgasm. The character is supposed to be fourteen or something, but the actress that played her was over the age of eighteen at the time that scene was shot, so nobody got up in arms over that.

I wanted to know if the actress in question was of age. Unfortunately, the IMDb page doesn’t even show them as being credited. I don’t know what the age of consent is in Argentina, and I don’t even know the actress’s name. Okay, I just looked it up at Wikipedia (I know) and this is what they had to say about it (there are no citations there, by the way):

“In Argentina, the age at which there are no restrictions for sexual activities is 18[citation needed], regardless of gender or sexual orientation[citation needed].”

You can read the rest here.

I have not watched the scene in question and I do not want to. I do have a Netflix account, and I did look it up to see if it was still there. The film is still there. It was released last year, by the way, so the young girls in the scene would only be a year or two older than they were when it was shot, depending on when the scene was shot. I first heard of this at PJ Media, of which has a screenshot from the scene, but their faces are obscured. You can see it here. I don’t even like looking at that screenshot. I have absolutely no desire to watch the scene or the whole film.

If this is legal in Argentina, that’s one thing. The film can just “stay” there. But here, that’s another story. I think the scene should be removed. Based on what I know of the film’s story, it is unnecessary anyway. The story can be told without it. Removing it wouldn’t change anything.

We shouldn’t be okay with this shit. We really shouldn’t, but even those supposedly on the right think it’s no big deal. We’re just prudes because the notion of a fucking ten year old child riding a pillow like a seasoned porn star squicks us out. Well, excuse the fuck out of me for having standards.