Browsed by
Author: Elaine Arias

A concession, of sorts

A concession, of sorts

I’ve been thinking about this for a while. One of the left’s favorite boogeymen is the evil corporation. Leftist writers just loooooove making evil corporations the villains of their dystopian novels.

It’s not just literature either. You see this in movies (Blade Runner, the Resident Evil franchise), TV shows, video games (again, Resident Evil), etc. They just love demonizing corporations, and I think it’s because they’re either socialists or communists.

But, given all that happened last year, with corporations like Alphabet (parent company of Google) firing James Damore over a memo he wrote, and MasterCard (of which is mostly owned by Muslims) demanding PayPal, Stripe, Patreon and others deplatform various conservatives, centrists and alternative services like Hatreon and FreeStartr over their politics, I’ve come to realize that we’re currently living in the dystopia these leftists warned us about.

Only problem is, these same leftists and their cohorts have no problem applauding these evil corporations. These corporations are run by leftists, so of course that is to be expected. These leftists also have no problem using these corporations to silence their critics and those that disagree with them.

Leftists will still claim to hate corporations, however, but when you ask them which ones, they’ll cite some random oil company, Enron, or Walmart. Even though Google is developing a search engine for China that censors information, they’ll never admit that Google is evil. Even though Mark Zuckerberg basically told Angela Merkel that Facebook would help her suppress any criticism of her insane immigration policies, leftists will never admit that Facebook is evil. Might I remind you that Facebook wants to develop mind-reading technology? Yeah, it’s true.

Mark Zuckerberg confirms Facebook is working on mind-reading technology

Facebook is developing technology to let users communicate using only their thoughts, the internet giant confirmed on Wednesday night. A secretive division at Facebook’s California headquarters has been experimenting with mind-reading technology for several months, the company revealed. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s founder, has previously described telepathy as the “ultimate communication technology”, but the social network’s ambitions have been unclear.

This is freaking scary. I still, rather stupidly, have a Facebook account, but I don’t use their official app. And, of course, I have uBlock Origin installed on all my desktop browsers (unfortunately it is not available for mobile devices).

I will probably get rid of it eventually, especially if this mind-reading technology comes to fruition. That is very, very creepy.

But, as I said, you don’t see the left calling Facebook out as much…they have no problem weaponizing these services to censor thoughts and ideas they don’t like. The left themselves have basically ensured that the nightmare they wrote about became a reality.

And the deplatforming continues

And the deplatforming continues

Photo by MILKOVÍ on Unsplash

Okay, so I might be a little late to the party, but I am also lazy and easily distracted. But I’ve been watching this story with interest, and it’s gotten to the point where I just have to say something.

I am, of course, talking about Patreon deleting Sargon of Akkad’s account. Sargon is a prominent center-left YouTuber and podcaster, whose real name is Carl Benjamin. He is a vocal opponent of political correctness and SJWs, and despite being a vocal opponent of the alt-right, leftists hate him anyway.

He made an appearance on Michelle Caitlin’s YouTube livestream on February 7, 2018, and used the phrase “white [DREADED N-WORD THAT MUST NEVER, EVER BE UTTERED, WRITTEN, READ OR EVEN THOUGHT]” while talking about some racist alt-righters. To clarify, he was using the racists’ own words and methods against them.  Here’s the evil words (thanks to One Angry Gamer):

“I just can’t be bothered with people who chose to treat me like this. It’s really annoying. Like, I — . You’re acting like a bunch of n*****s, just so you know. You act like white n*****s. Exactly how you describe black people acting is the impression I get dealing with the Alt Right. I’m really, I’m just not in the mood to deal with this kind of disrespect.”

“Look, you carry on, but don’t expect me to then have a debate with one of your f**gots.…Like why would I bother?…Maybe you’re just acting like a n****r, mate? Have you considered that? Do you think white people act like this? White people are meant to be polite and respectful to one another, and you guys can’t even act like white people, it’s really amazing to me.”

Some asshole took it out of context and reported it to Patreon, who then deleted his account, claiming that he had violated their terms of service.

This appearance didn’t take place on his YouTube channel. He did not advertise it on his Patreon page. So, one would wonder, where’s the violation of their terms of service? Oh, there isn’t one. But Patreon, like Twitter, has a Trust and Safety Council. Yeah, those things are extremely Orwellian. They exist only to censor people the leftists don’t like.

The mainstream media – and by ‘mainstream media’ I mean the handful of tech sites and bloggers that have bothered to cover this story – are predictably labeling Sargon as an alt-right monster, even though he isn’t alt-right (they’re also calling Laci Green, who used to be an obnoxious feminazi but is now at least open-minded enough to not label her opponents as utter monsters now, an alt-righter).

So Sargon decides to set up an account with an Patreon alternative, called Subscribe Star. A few other prominent people decided to ditch Patreon and move over to Subscribe Star.

This pissed off the left, so a couple of asshole leftists decided to investigate Subscribe Star’s infrastructure and operations. I made a few posts on Gab about it, but they got lost in the sea of activity.

The two people in question are Becca Lewis and Tim Squirrell. Becca Lewis, who I guess is some sort of leftist blogger, did a great deal of the legwork and probably got the ball rolling on this. Tim Squirrell egged her on and helpfully posted a list of services Subscribe Star uses.

One of those services was PayPal. We already know that PayPal has been on a banning spree, denying services to Milo, Alex Jones and other vicious thoughtcriminals. So, predictably, they have denied services to Subscribe Star.

But, Subscribe Star is run by a Russian guy who is absolutely not taking this shit lying down. They’re working on a solution to this problem and haven’t banned Sargon or any of their new members. Right now, I highly recommend Subscribe Star. I’d use it, but I don’t think I have much of a following and I don’t really have much to offer anyway.

SubscribeStar on Twitter

SubscribeStar on Twitter

https://t.co/a5Unknf4HU

You can read more about PayPal’s despicable actions in this Financial Times article. It’s an archive link because they put their stuff behind a paywall.

And now to my favorite part of this whole story. A prominent leftist philosopher, atheist, commentator and podcaster, Sam Harris, has deleted his Patreon account due to all of this, all the while still being a leftist. I can’t help but have a lot of respect for this guy.

FREE SPEECH HERO: Liberal Sam Harris Deletes His Top 13 Patreon Account Over Political Bias Against Conservatives

Sam Harris is is a very popular American author, philosopher, neuroscientist, critic of religion, public intellectual, and podcast host. Sam Harris also has the 13th most popular account on Patreon. Patreon is a is a media platform that provides business tools for artists, writers and creators to run a subscription content service and raise money …

I don’t expect people to magically agree with me on everything. I’m just asking you to see me, and my fellow right-wingers as human beings. That’s all. I have no desire to silence anyone, despite wishing that some people would just shut up already. But am I going to actively censor them? No! Hell, if it weren’t for these people my blog wouldn’t have much content at all! The give and take is an important part of our society.

But the left doesn’t want that. They just want to shut people up.

Oh, and some more cool news? Jordan Peterson (who is not insane) is working on a Patreon alternative!

Gab’s got a payment processor and crowd funding alternative in the works as well.

Meanwhile, Far Left Watch is calling for action:

Far-left extremists are raising money on Patreon to “inspire insurrection”.

Patreon is back in the news following another round of what appears to be an ideological purge from their platform. In the last few days the accounts for Milo Yiannopoulos, Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad), and James Allsup were all terminated.

Oh, and it gets even better.  So Jacqueline Hart, the head of their Orwellian trust and safety team, has been doing some damage control.  The team has been emailing various YouTubers, desperately trying to keep them from leaving, etc.  Ms. Hart herself called YouTuber Matt Christiansen, and while he could not record the phone call, he did provide a transcript.  You can get a summary of what was said at the video below.

Here’s a direct-link to the transcript.  I highly recommend reading it.  I might fisk it after Christmas.  In short, Patreon does not support free speech and they “aren’t a free market”, whatever that’s supposed to mean.  So, basically, if they don’t like you, you can kindly fuck off.  That’s the conclusion I’ve drawn thus far.

I am sure it’s going to get even more ridiculous as more and more people have decided to ditch Patreon as soon as it’s feasible to do so.  I feel sorry for the non-political people that have been affected by this.

We need the wall

We need the wall

Photo by rawpixel on Unsplash

I stupidly watched a beheading video.  I’ve seen beheading videos, and videos of people being burned alive, and people being stoned to death, and so on.  At some point, however, I decided to stop watching that kind of stuff.  It was starting to bother me, causing nightmares and such.

But I was browsing Reddit and came across a thread about a Danish woman being beheaded.  Two women, one Danish, one Norweigan, both in their mid-twenties, were hiking in Morocco.  Both were found dead.  Then a video of Muslim men beheading one of the women surfaced.

You can read more about it at Pamela Geller’s site, of which includes the video itself.  It’s only about a minute long and is kind of blurry, but still graphic and disturbing.

‘ACT OF TERROR’: WARNING Graphic VIDEO showing female tourists ‘beheaded’ in Morocco, 3 jihadis ARRESTED, ‘It’s Allah’s will’ – Geller Report

Geller Report first brought you this story in “Moderate” Morocco on Tuesday: two female tourists found BEHEADED in Morocco. Three devout Muslims have been arrested after two female backpackers were found with severe neck injuries in their tent at a popular trekking spot in Morocco.

This is why we need a wall.  This is why we didn’t sign that bullshit UN migrant pact.  This is why Trump wanted that ‘Muslim ban’ that wasn’t even an effective ban at all, one that the mainstream media blew out of proportion.

It’s just a fact that people from the Middle East kind of resemble people from Central America.  They have brown skin and dark hair.  You wouldn’t really tell the difference between the two if you only had a fleeting glance at them.  Hell, I’m not Arab but I’ve been mistaken for an Arab person and people have asked me if I’m Indian, and some people just look at me and go, “what are you, exactly?”  I’m not saying this because I’m a racist cunt.  I’m saying this because it’s just simple logic.  Furthermore, Mexicans and other Central Americans aren’t strangers to this sort of horrific violence.  They behead and mutilate people too.  At least, gang members and the drug cartels do.

The mentality these two women undoubtedly had is also utterly ridiculous.  They probably thought that by traveling in Morocco, they were being good little non-racist girls that embrace diversity and whatever else.  I’m not saying you have to be racist, but you do need to have some common sense.  Traveling alone anywhere in the Middle East – even supposed ‘moderate’ nations like Morocco – is suicidal.  Even traveling with another woman is suicidal, as we have just seen.  There are so many beautiful places on this planet that aren’t full of bloodthirsty Musloids who rape and kill those who reject their sexual advances.

I can’t get over how completely insane these people are.  BEHEADING someone simply because they don’t want to have sex with you?  What the fuck is wrong with these people?

That was a (mostly) rhetorical question.  One thing nobody really wants to discuss is the rampant inbreeding throughout the Middle East.  Take a look at the perps in the link above.  They all look, to put it charitably, weird.  I wouldn’t be surprised if they were inbred.

And the video…I really wish I hadn’t watched it.  I’ve seen horrible violent videos before, and I didn’t need to see another one.  At this point, I already know how monstrous these people are.  If you’ve never seen one before…well, if you absolutely have to, all I can tell you is that it’s at least short and kinda-sorta blurry…but you’ll still see and hear things you’ll never be able to get out of your mind.

I don’t advocate the genocide of Muslims, but if there are any sane, moderate Muslims out there…you’ve gotta admit there’s something seriously wrong with a lot of your brethren.  It’s obvious that it’s both religious and cultural, and that’s being spread across the world thanks to the insane immigration policies of various countries.  If a Muslim is living their life, minding their own business and not hurting anyone, I have no beef with them.  I am not, however, going to stop calling out the problem for what it is.  If we Catholics have to bear the brunt of the priest abuse scandal, you can do the same for terrorism.

Now I’m just messed up and scared to go to bed and my throat feels funny and I’m just going to go play video games now.

Anatomy of a hit piece

Anatomy of a hit piece

Elle magazine recently published a hit piece on Lara Trump, Eric Trump’s wife.  As I figured it would be, it was extremely biased and incredibly insulting to its subject.

It’s from their November 2018 issue, the one with Lady GaGa on the cover.  It’s supposed to be the Women in Hollywood issue (like there haven’t been enough of these…Jesus, they come out with like, five of these damn things every year) or something, and I’m mystified as to why they chose to profile Lara Trump – she’s not an actress or singer or even writer – but there you go.  

Now, I’ve been reading fashion magazines since I was ten years old.  It’s been a long time for me.  I don’t read them as often anymore, and I don’t actually buy them (they are way too expensive these days), but every now and then I’ll read an issue if someone interesting is on the cover.

While I’m not going to fisk every single line in this profile, I am going to quote the parts that are extremely biased.

The name of the profile is The Good Soldier.  The author of this tripe is Emma Rosenblum.

So, after being introduced to Lara Trump, we get to the part where she goes on the campaign trail for her father in law.  The author feels it necessary to provide “fact checks” after everything Lara says.

“Lara immediately went out in the field, campaigning up to six days a week, traveling across America with a group of pro-Trump women whom she’d assembled with the mission of softening their candidate’s image, with female voters in particular.  “There was a narrative out there that Donald Trump was a bad person,” Lara says.  (At the time, Trump had already been accused by multiple women of sexual harassment; “Grab ’em by the pussy” was unearthed in October of that year.)”

So, of course, God forbid their readers make up their own minds.  I think most people remember when the Access Hollywood tape surfaced; the media wouldn’t shut up about it.  The media demonized Trump as a bona fide rapist who routinely groped women.  I have always believed that his pussy comment was a figure of speech and a commentary on famewhores and groupies, who basically let you do whatever you want to them in exchange for fame, money or both.  As for those accusations…only one woman, I think, bothered to offer up her name, and they all ended up being completely baseless.  Too bad, Emma – Trump is not Bill Clinton.  That’s the real rapist, and I’ll bet you a million dollars Emma voted for him and his enabling wife.

“…Donald Trump’s presidency has been every bit as disorienting and frightening as many feared…

This has no business being in this profile.  It is not fact, it’s opinion.  What does this have to do with Lara Trump and the job she was hired to do?  Nothing.

“She looks expensive; her Van Cleef & Arpels earrings shine.  She’s polished, controlled, articulate, impossibly on message.  In other words, everything our dear leader is not.”

Another line that has absolutely no business being in this profile.  This is opinion – the author’s opinion on someone other than the subject of her profile.  Why is this even here?  We want to know about Lara Trump.  Presumably, the reader isn’t necessarily interested in the author’s bullshit opinion on the President, of which is completely unfounded.  I don’t see the President as being the opposite of any of those things.  No, really, I don’t.  The only thing he does that comes close to being unpolished might be some of his tweets, but then again, everyone makes mistakes.  Trump’s appeal is that people don’t see him as a slick, corrupt politician who says exactly what people want to hear, only to renege on it once in office.  Plenty of mid-term Democratic candidates are already on record stating that they have no desire to maintain the moderate positions they campaigned on.

Right now, Lara Trump serves as an advisor to the President’s 2020 reelection campaign (yes, bitches, he’s running for reelection.  Feel free to fucking kill yourselves now – it’ll do us a universe of good).

“Lara also makes regular appearances on Fox News and hosts a web series on the campaign site called Real News Update, in which she boasts about Trump’s accomplishments in an effort to refute the “fake news” bias that Trump and Co. are so fixated on.”

Emma Rosenbitch writes this shit with a straight face and wonders why “Trump and Co.” are so “fixated” on bias.  Uh, hello, bitch?  Do you have any self-awareness whatsoever?  Evidently not.  Emma basically says that Lara is either completely deluded or is a stone cold liar later on in this stupid article.  She insults Lara, the subject of her article, the President, and the people that voted for him.  Oh, but Trump and “company” are fixated on something that, according to this bitch, doesn’t exist.  Her article and every single one of her bitchy little barbs is further proof of that “bias” “Trump and Co.” are so fucking fixated on.  DUH.

“Heading into the midterms, and, crucially, looking toward the 2020 election, the white women demographic that Lara is tasked with preaching to is the wild card that Trump fears.”

Feminazis are clearly deluded over the POWER they have over us all.  On the one hand, they’re eternal and perpetual rape victims trapped in a dystopian patriarchal hell, and on the other hand, they’re FIERCE BAD ASS BITCHES and SLAY QUEENS and whatever else.  Pick one, bitches – either you’re a slay queen or you’re a rape victim.  You can’t be both.

Oh, and it’s just so cute that Lara’s campaigning (that’s what she does, Emma, you stupid feckless cunt) is preaching, because Elle and Vogue and Marie Claire and Cosmopolitan’s constant fear-mongering over abortion and whatever else isn’t preaching at all.  Too bad you can’t see my big huge fucking eyeroll.  My eyes are rolling so hard right now I think they might roll right out of my skull.

And, to top it all off, this is from the same people that raked that very demographic over the coals for voting for Trump in the first place, but they’re so confident that these women they despise will come around and vote for whatever demented, degenerate baby killer the Democrats will shit out for 2020.

“At press time, Civiqs tracking found that 20 percent of women without college degrees have an unfavorable view of Donald Trump.  It’s up to Lara to keep Republican women in the fold, to give the Trump administration a peppy, TV-friendly sheen for those low-information female voters who’d like to reelect Trump and not have to feel bad about it.  (Initially, this was seen to be Ivanka’s mission, but as she’s gotten mired in actual fraught policy debates, Lara has emerged as the nice white lady Trump mom of the moment.)”

Let me start out by saying that Emma Rosenblum is a complete cunt.  A blood-belching, pus-dribbling cunt.  First thing I noticed was the bitchy cuntish remark about low-information female voters (Rush Limbaugh wants his phrase back, bitch) but now that I’m actually examining it, there’s a lot wrong with this.

First of all, who the fuck takes polls seriously anymore, except for people working in campaigns?  How did that work out for Emma’s Lady and Saviour Hillary Clinton?  Furthermore, even if these polls were accurate, things change.  They change rather quickly in politics.

Secondly, the author seems to assume that while those uneducated women don’t have a favorable view of Trump, they’ll vote for him anyway.  She equates “women without college degrees” with “Republican women” and calls those women “low-information voters.”  More of that bias “Trump and Co.” are, like, totally paranoid about.

I voted for Trump in 2016 and I’ll do so again in 2020.  I’m not white, I’m female and I have two college degrees.  A woman without a college degree isn’t uneducated and that does not mean she’s automatically a Republican.  What the fuck?  And that certainly does not mean she’s “low-information.”  Fucking bitch, I swear.

“Eric, who at the time was executive vice president of the Trump Organization, now runs the day-to-day operations, a role that he and Donald Jr. took over when their dad got elected.  Lara takes issue with the media’s portrayal of her husband (she takes issue with the media’s portrayal of most things.)”

SO?  AND?  Lara’s right!  Your bullshit article is more proof that there IS a bias.  You’ve portrayed Lara as some dumb, corrupt, filthy rich racist white woman who blindly does what her husband and father-in-law tells her.  I can’t blame the woman for taking issue with the media’s portrayal of “most things.”  Of course she does.  I do as well, and Emma Rosenbitch isn’t helping her own case.  And yeah, based on what I read, the media’s portrayal of Eric Trump is highly unfair, but that’s no surprise.  The media is full of communist shitheads who hate Christians and Republicans and white people and straight people and anyone else that’s even marginally different from them.

“On Saturday Night Live, Eric is parodied as a privileged dunce, while his brother Donald Jr. is portrayed as a marginally intelligent, if more devious.  “Obviously they’ve got it very wrong, in my opinion – my husband is one of the most smartest people I’ve ever met,” she says.  “And it’s so funny to see how people try to interpret the family.  I think it’s just because Eric is under the radar that they don’t really have a sense of him.”  So what is Eric really like?  “I’ll tell you, he works so hard.  One of the few things that really frustrates me is when people claim that the Trump family doesn’t work.  I mean, the daily things that Eric has to deal with on all of his properties, unimaginable stuff, people filing lawsuits left and right about crazy things.  He’s doing an incredible job.  I think his dad is very proud of him,” she says.  (Eric, along with Ivanka and Donald Jr., is named in a lawsuit against Trump brought by the New York state attorney general that alleges improper use of the Trump Foundation’s funds for campaign purposes; the Trumps have filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, and they deny the claims have any merit.)”

So, once again comes the unnecessary and bullshit “fact check” because, once again, God forbid anyone let Lara’s words speak for themselves.  Of course she’d be full of praise for both her husband and father-in-law.  Most people would, though.  Of course, Emma Rosenbitch has no problem with the Clintons using their shitty Foundation to enrich themselves…I guess that’s the only proper way to use a Foundation.  They’ve probably used their foundation to fund her campaign, but the media covers for the Clintons, so no lawsuit for them.  This lawsuit against Trump, like that bullshit collusion investigation, is nothing more than a bunch of disgruntled Democrats doing everything to destroy Trump’s presidency.  His kids aren’t the only ones stating that the claims have no merit.

“As for the rest of the family, Lara is “very close” with Ivanka, she says.  “I think they’re doing as well as they can,” she says of Ivanka and Jared’s life in DC.  “It’s really hard.  I don’t envy them at all.  People are protesting outside their house, and they have children in there.  But I think they’re making a huge difference.”  What difference, I ask? “If you look at the prison reform stuff, Jared’s worked so hard on that.  I know he’s working so hard on the Middle East.  Ivanka with the paid family leave – there’s so much stuff.” (The prison reform legislation is at a standstill; Trump recently announced the shuttering of the Palestinian diplomatic mission in the US; no paid family leave policy has been implemented – Ivanka has said that this will “take time.”)”

Rolling my eyes again.  While yes, it may be true that Ivanka and Jared might not have gotten all of their wishlist items accomplished, I think the Trump administration has done some great things.  Lowest black unemployment in years, we ditched the Paris climate bullshit, we didn’t sign the bullshit UN migration pact, some manufacturing has returned to the US, and our gas prices are lower.  The wall hasn’t been built, though, and that really irritates the shit out of me.  And, of course, there’s the NAFTA thing.  Things aren’t too bad right now.  The left is still throwing a temper tantrum over 2016 so they think that anything that doesn’t remotely go their way is basically rape and oppression and whatever else they’ve got bouncing around their stupid heads.  

But this profile isn’t about Ivanka and Jared’s accomplishments or non-accomplishments.  There’s no need to fucking fact-check Lara’s words.  Notice how Emma totally glossed over the fact that her fellow demented leftists are literally protesting outside Ivanka’s home.  Well, she doesn’t totally dismiss it, but she does minimize it later on.

“Lara then launches into talking points that I recognize from her speeches at Trump’s rallies, which you can watch on YouTube and which are riveting in a dystopian, filmic way.”

Once again, more bias.  I could say the same fucking thing about Obama’s creepy-as-fuck rallies and that creepy-as-fuck “Mmm mmm mmm Barack Hussein Obama” song sung by creepy Children of the Corn.  These people act like Trump has cornered the market on slavish devotion and that’s not true.  Witness their stupid reaction to Hillary losing.  People bawling in public, on camera, over a fucking election.  Or that nutjob screaming her head off at Trump’s inauguration.

I think the left is just pissed off that Trump enjoys far more popularity than Hillary.  Nobody held rallies like that for Hillary.

“…And, unfortunately, given that we live in the climate that we do, a lot of things will never get reported.  But i say this to people all the time – 50 years from now, when we look back on this period in time in the United States and this presidency, I really do think that people are going to say that Donald Trump was actually really, really great for the United States of America.”  Cute rapturous applause and chants of “Lock her up!”

Oh, but Trump will totally be impeached, you guys.  Cue chants of “Yes we can!”

I don’t know how Trump will be viewed by history, but I am pretty sure that historians will look at the hysterical years-long temper tantrum of the left and wonder what the hell is wrong with them.

“She’s a natural politician, really.  Because I can’t tell if she believes her spin – the White House is a smoothly running machine; Trump loves women; he cares about immigrants; he’s a strong, smart leader; he wants what’s best for the country – which, based on every single story coming out of the White House for the past two years, is completely, totally, maybe 1,000 percent untrue, or if she’s lying through her bright white teeth.”

And here it is.  Either Lara Trump is Joseph Goebbels in drag, or she’s, like, totes 1,000 percent a liar!  

The White House is a smoothly running machine.  If you call letting a fucking US ambassador DIE in a terrorist attack, only to have his fucking corpse paraded down the streets running smoothly then you’re fucking deluded.  Trump ended up with a lot of treacherous assholes in the Cabinet and in the FBI.  Plus, the media is a propaganda machine that blows up every little thing to make Trump look bad.  

She wants us to believe that Trump hates women.  Really?  So, can you explain to me why he has two fucking daughters? Can you explain to me why he let his two sons marry women?  Can you explain to me why he allowed his granddaughters to be born?  I mean, he’s been married to three women so far – two of whom are immigrants.  He is a strong, smart leader.  Trump was very successful in a very difficult real estate market.  And now he’s President of the United States when everyone in the fucking media said he had no chance.  Furthermore, it’s not his job to “care” about immigrants (and what she really means by “care” is allow every foreigner on Earth to invade the US and live here without being citizens while the rest of us slave away to keep these fuckers fed and sheltered).  And if her Lady and Saviour can’t beat Trump the Rapist in a Presidential campaign, what does that say about her?  I guess she isn’t too fucking bright either.

Letting our country be overrun by hostile foreigners and feminazis is not what’s best for the country.  It simply isn’t.  This section has no business being in this article.  Once again, the author injects her opinions in a personality profile, and wonders why we complain about media bias.

There’s a really long section about how Lara can go about New York City without being hassled by people, and that this random person claims that nobody heckles Lara or anyone else associated with the Trump administrtion.  Lara and others on the right side of the aisle are routinely heckled and harassed by asshole leftists, and Emma wants you to know that they’re all lying.  It’s just sunshine and roses for Trump supporters in NYC.

“I know she feels like they’re hated in the city, and I’m sure that’s not unwarranted,” Aronson says.  “But to be honest, when I’m with them, I’ve never experienced that.  I’ve never seen anyone heckle them; I’ve never seen a negative response.  IN fact, I’ve seen the opposite.  I’ve seen people come up to Eric at dinner and say, ‘I really love your father.'” Says Perozzi, “In almost any other city in this country, she and that family would be treated like royalty.  Imagine if they lived in Dallas!  I mean, the doors would open.  Here, that’s certainly not the case, and in many cases, it’s the opposite.  She has a circle of friends, she’s very close to her family, and her parents are very involved.  And she and Eric have a routine; they go to certain restaurants regularly.  And it’s fine, but I don’t think there’s an outpouring of love or, like, sentiment when people see them, for sure.”

That’s because most crazy leftists don’t know who Eric or Lara Trump are.  They don’t know what he looks like, and most New Yorkers are probably used to seeing them.  Just because these two dillweeds haven’t experienced any heckling doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen.  It has certainly happened to Ivanka on a number of occasions.

“This idea of the Trump family as victims is a theme that Lara returns to, whether she’s discussing her own experience, Jared and Ivanka’s, or the president and Melania’s.”

It’s true.   They are victims of being heckled by nutjob leftists.  As I said, there’s documented instances of Ivanka being heckled in public.

Man Removed from Commercial Flight After Harassing Ivanka Trump and Family | Breitbart

Ivanka, who was with her husband Jared Kushner and three children, was harassed by a male passenger who told her that “Your father is ruining the country,” before declaring that “She should be flying private.” According to another passenger on board the flight, Ivanka ignored the man and attempted to distract her children by playing with crayons.

But, according to Emma, the Trumps aren’t allowed to claim victim status.  They, like, totally deserve it.

“It’s got to be really isolating to be the First Lady, and I don’t think people ever really consider that,” Lara says.  “You can’t go for a walk down the street.  Especially in an environment like this, it must be really, really lonely.”  And what about Melania’s Zara jacket, the one she wore to visit the children’s refugee center, with “I really don’t care.  Do u?” scribbled across the back? “I really don’t know what that jacket was.  I haven’t even asked her about that.  But she’s a smart woman,” she adds.  “She speaks, like, five languages.  She’s incredible.”

Notice how there’s no fact check for this statement.  Let me go ahead and offer one.  Melania’s jacket had that phrase printed on the back, not scribbled.  Melania didn’t have anyone put that message on the back of it.  That’s just how it was.  She wore that in reference to the criticism she kept getting from the media, as that was at the height of the “oh my god, children are being put in cages” nonsense.  It was aimed at the media and she said so.  Lastly, she removed the jacket before she arrived at the center itself.  The future Democrat voters – I mean, “refugees” – didn’t even see her wear it.

Melania Wore ‘Don’t Care’ Jacket to Show Critics They Will Not Stop Her

“I often asking myself if I would not wear that jacket if I would have so much media coverage,” Trump told Chief National Affairs Correspondent Tom Llamas in the interview conducted during her recent trip to Africa.

Oh, we’ll get to the children in cages issue later.  Bitch Emma does offer a “fact check” for that.

“As Lara rises in rank, she’s been studying the president’s policy positions.  She touches on these in her Real News Update segments and also during our talk.  We’re at the height of the refugee crisis, just after Trump has reversed curse on US Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s zero tolerance policy, and so I ask for her thoughts on this.  “It was definitely going on under President Obama,” she begins, ” and, of course, this is a president who has been very strong on immigration.  We can’t have open borders – that doesn’t work for any country.  But that doesnt’ mean that we’re not going to help people or do hte right thing.” (The zero tolerance policy was created during the Trump administration; the detention centers were created under the Obama administration to deal with the increase of unaccompanied migrant children.  The Obama administration did not purposely separate children from their families as part of an immigration policy.)”

More bias, and an outright lie.  The zero tolerance policy’s purpose was NOT to deliberately separate children from their parents for the sake of separating families!  She at least got the bit about the detention centers partially right – they were created during the Obama admin.  The images of “cages” were from the Obama years.  The administration chose to continue to detain people because you can’t put these children in PRISON, you fuckwits!  Furthermore, a great deal of those children came WITHOUT their parents!  The adults those kids came with weren’t their parents in the fucking first place!  At least for some of them!  But Emma Rosenbitch wants you to believe that Trump and Jeff Sessions and whoever else were cackling and saying racist stuff while planning to separate these poor innocent widdle brown families for no good reason, and no, that’s not what happened.  At all.

“She blames the media for blowing the whole thing out of proportion.  “It’s very hard to filter.  Even for me, a family member who understands what is going on, some of the things I see, I have to remind myself, Well, that’s not the reality, that is a bit of a stretch.  It’s not like the president said, ‘I want to rip…'” she trails off, careful not to complete the sentence.  “I mean, come on, that’s crazy.”  This is the ice cream guy, remember.  The guy whose heart she knows.  The guy who would never hurt an animal or rip a baby from his screaming mother’s arms.”

That baby you would have probably aborted if it had been yours, you mean?  No, the President never had any intention of ripping your precious brown babies from their mothers.  I don’t know why it’s a problem when Trump does it, but it’s just another day when Obama did the same fucking thing.  Unless this deluded bitch really thinks Trump sits in the Oval Office and cackles at footage of some Mexican woman having her anchor baby taken away from her because she was stupid enough to commit a crime whilst holding her anchor baby in her arms.  Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.  I hate it when feminazis talk about babies.  Everyone knows damn well that these bitches get moist at the thought of slaughtering an innocent baby in the womb or even in its crib, especially if that baby come between them and their sleazy bar hopping.

“In August, Lara’s plan to stay under the radar blows up, foiled by one Omarosa Manigault Newman, who, as part of her publicity tour for her tell-all book, Unhinged, releases audio of Lara offering her $15,000 a month to work on Trump’s 2020 campaign in exchange for her silence regarding her time in the White House.”

Yeah, Omarosa’s shitty little tome crashed and burned.  I had forgotten all about that.  Oh yeah, Lara and the President are quaking in their boots over this.  It’s kind of suspicious that they’d offer Omarosa anything in exchange for her silence, but then again, this is Omarosa, and offering her a lot of money to keep her mouth shut is probably easier than dealing with whatever nutjob lie she might tell to promote herself.  I guess this is supposed to “prove” that Trump is corrupt and insane but to be honest, nobody really cared about what Omarosa had to say.

“It’s the day after Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, was convicted of five counts of tax fraud, two counts of bank fraud, and one count of failure to disclose a foreign bank account; and after Michael Cohen, Trump’s former laywer-slash-fixer, pleaded guilty to violating campaign violence law.  Have the recent developments affected the mood of the rally?  “I don’t think anybody at the rally paid mind to anything other than the fact that the president was there,” she says.  “It’s an amazing feeling, people cheering and clapping.”

She’s good, Lara.  She never breaks.  She never wavers.  An expert in glossing over reality, she’s just vague enough so that it’s hard to poke holes in her propaganda.  And Trump, recognizing the power of his beautiful mouthpiece, has elevated her beyond what she thought possible.

Of course, Lara can’t possibly be telling the truth.  She’s just spewing propaganda.  Lara’s right.  Most of us Trump supporters weren’t really fazed by Manafort and Cohen’s convictions, especially since Manafort’s convictions had nothing to do with the actual campaign. It certainly had nothing to do with the bogus Russia witch hunt.

Paul Manafort Found Guilty on 8 Counts, Mistrial Declared on 10

The other ten counts ended in a mistrial, with the jurors unable to reach a unanimous verdict. Manafort was found guilty of five counts of tax fraud, two of bank fraud, and one for failure to properly register a foreign bank account. The jurors informed Judge T.S.

The piece ends with a quote on Lara’s possible future in politics.

Thank GOD I am done with this.  I am so pissed off at this stupid “article.”  It is so extremely biased and incredibly insulting.  Elle has done this before – back in 2010, they published a nasty hit piece on Sarah Palin, and a couple of years after that, wrote an insulting piece about “mini Palins” and they’re far from the only fashion magazine with liberal bias.  These people have no self-awareness whatsoever.

This, also, is why these stupid magazines are going out of business.  Well, it’s one reason.  A lot of women are Republican.  Those women are not interested in reading a Democratic feminazi pamphlet.  These magazines are supposed to be about fashion, not bullshit Dem talking points, but here they are.  

Oh, and if you think this is standard fare for a profile, think again.  The vast majority of the stories they do on public figures is fawning nonsense that doesn’t challenge anything the subject says or does.  The only exception is for non-leftists like Lara Trump and Sarah Palin.  There was no bullshit “fact checks” for the things Lady GaGa, their cover star, said.  Nope.  Only Lara Trump.  

Prudishness is the new hotness

Prudishness is the new hotness

Photo by Tracy Le Blanc from Pexels

So leftist outfits like Tumblr and Facebook have decided to ban sexually explicit material.  The reason?  Well, in the case of Facebook, it’s to pander to Muslims and other religions that take an extremely hard-line stance to shockingly sexual things like bare ankles and bare heads.  OMG SO OFFENSIVE!!!!

Facebook Also Becoming a Sexuality-Free Zone: Reason Roundup

Just a few days after Tumblr announced that it would ban all pornography, Facebook has pulled the proverbial hold my beer with its new “Sexual Solicitation” policy.

As for Tumblr, well, they had a seriously bad child porn problem.  Tumblr tried to fix the problem, but that didn’t work, so now they’re banning all sexually explicit content.  This is also why the Tumblr app disappeared from the App store.  It is still in my iPad’s update list, and it won’t go away because the app is literally no longer in the store.  Hopefully it’ll be allowed back in now.

Tumblr to ban adult content after issues with child pornography on site

Tumblr on Monday announced it will ban all adult content from its website, a move that comes just two weeks after it acknowledged child pornography had found its way onto the platform. The microblogging and social networking site said in a statement that adult content will be not permitted on the platform starting Dec.

I don’t like censorship.  The Internet has been around for a while now, and I’m used to porn being readily available.  I feel that parents should do as much as they can to keep their kids from seeing that kind of stuff.  One the one hand, this is sad, especially with regards to Facebook and their reasons for doing it.  On the other hand, it’s a little bit harder for kids to stumble on porn now.  That’s good.

It’s just amusing to me how the left is now acting like those prudish Christians they love to hate.

Yes, feminists ruin everything

Yes, feminists ruin everything

Okay, most people wouldn’t consider me a big time gamer, but I consider myself a gamer. That being said, I haven’t played the Battlefield series at all. I’m not that into those ultra-realistic first person shooters that just look like war simulations. If you’re into that, cool. Before becoming obsessed with Fallout 4, I’ve never been good at first person shooters on console. The only first person shooter I played before that was the No One Lives Forever series on PC.

And yes, I am a console peasant. Sigh. But I’ve been watching this whole Battlefield V kerfluffle with interest, since the left has basically been trying to insert their bullshit into gaming for quite some time now.

So, if you don’t know, Battlefield V is the latest in a series, and it’s been marketed as a World War 2 first-person shooter. For some stupid reason, they chose to highlight a female character who has a prosthetic arm and seems to be fighting along with actual soldiers.

Which, as we all know, isn’t historically accurate in the least. There may have been female snipers in the Soviet army, but there were no women fighting in any of the WW2 theaters. Like, none. You don’t have to be a historical expert to know that. Furthermore, I highly doubt someone with a fucking prosthetic arm would even be allowed to fight in the first place.

So, gamers saw this gross historical inaccuracy as yet another bullshit SJW move by the left, and said as much online.

The reaction from the developers, DICE and the publisher, EA, was predictable. Like the rancid SJWs they are, they doubled down and insulted anyone that took issue with their silly WW2 fantasies.

So the game was released to great fanfare from the obviously biased and cucked gaming press, despite missing a significant part of the multiplayer mode (due in March 2019, of course…a full on four months from now) and some other glitches. Retailers have already gone to marking the price down – in the case of Target, you can get this game for 50% off the retail price. Yep, it’s only $30 there, if you’re curious. Of course, that might be due to the Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales, but still.

Now, I love alternate history and such. After all, one of my favorite movies is Inglorious Basterds. Spoiler alert: no, Hitler wasn’t assassinated in a movie theater in France. But we all know that, the writer and director, Quentin Tarantino knows that, and the whole point of the movie is that it’s a metaphor for how effective stories can be. Hitler has been assassinated by writers and filmmakers ever since 1945 now.

Even so, that film took great care to be accurate to its time, even going so far as to have a significant amount of dialogue be in French and German, complete with German and French actors who speak multiple languages in real life.

So why DICE didn’t just market the game as historical fantasy or alternate history is something that is utterly beyond me, especially given the popularity of Amazon’s adaptation of the Philip K. Dick novel, The Man in the High Castle. So, they could have marketed it as alternate history, and maybe some people would have rolled their eyes at the Bionic Woman Soldier, but it wouldn’t have caused so much drama.

I think most of the drama has to do with DICE and EA’s reaction to gamer criticism, though. Instead of being professional about it, they just went, “oh if you don’t like it, don’t play it.” I hate that argument, even though I’ve used it myself. It’s a really lazy argument that just brushes any criticism aside without even addressing it. Well, no, I never had any intention of playing it, but that doesn’t mean I can’t talk about it.

Oh, and take a look at this from their launch party in Sweden. As I said, they doubled down, and every shithead leftist is creaming their pants over it. The person that posted this on Twitter, however, deleted his tweet. Unfortunately for him the Internet is forever. Get your barf bag ready…some feminazi posted about it on Twitter, sperging about equality or whatever: ultra-mega cringe. Also, thanks to Kotaku in Action for this cringe.

genderfield V

Also, they decided to put the Bionic Woman Soldier on the cover of the standard edition. Evil white supremacist is on the Deluxe Edition cover.

genderfield v cover

However, the most despicable part of this is how they revised one of Norway’s significant contributions to the fight against the Nazis. Yes, a group of Norweigan men and British men’s contributions were wiped out and credit now goes to a fictional woman and her daughter. I am not making this shit up.

So, the Norwegians and British basically destroyed a shipment of heavy water, of which the Nazis were going to use to make an atomic bomb. In this game, the mission to destroy the heavy water is now done by a Norwegian woman and her daughter, who, I guess, you play as. Yes, this daughter manages to take down a whole lot of German soldiers before succumbing to hypothermia.

So Operation Gunnerside, which was the mission in real life, is now Operation Bad-Ass 100lb Chick. And they wonder why people are so pissed off. This is a little known aspect of WW2 history and they’re rewriting it to please stupid cunts like Anita Sarkeesian (oh, how I hate that bitch so much). You should just watch the video above — it’s 22 minutes long but worth it, as it goes into the actual history of the event better than I can.

That’s not to say that women didn’t make significant contributions to the war effort. We all know they did, but lying about it helps no one. In the video above, a teenage girl manages to fight off a German soldier – a grown man – while she suffers from freaking hypothermia. Most men couldn’t achieve such a feat, and yet DICE wants us to think that some sick teenage girl can fight off a grown man? Come on!

If you want to play a female-centric WW2 game, I recommend Velvet Assassin, even though I haven’t even finished it. It’s a stealth game where you play a fictionalized female British spy, and it’s based on a real person. I have it for the Xbox 360 and Mac, and I played a little bit of it, but didn’t finish because I suck at stealth games. You can read about it at the game’s Wikipedia page.

World War 2 is far more complex than anyone really thinks, and we cannot allow the left to distort it and simplify it to serve their interests. We just can’t. That’s why I, and many others complain about stuff like this. Revisionism sucks.

Liberal Hypocrisy: Gaming Edition

Liberal Hypocrisy: Gaming Edition

So I’m gonna have to get a copy of Red Dead Redemption 2, because you can kill feminazis in it.  This is according to ViceVice is donkey shit, just so you know.

‘Red Dead Redemption 2’ Players Are Excited to Kill Feminists in the Game

Rockstar Games included a historically accurate portrayal of women fighting for their right to vote, and players are making the worst of it.

Archive link so you don’t get donkey shit on your computer.

But I remember some shitty games from a few years ago, where you could kill tea partiers and stuff.  Funny how Vice didn’t go in rage mode when this shitty game was released:

Gamescom: Shoot Racist Tea Partiers in ‘Battlefield Hardline’ | Breitbart

In the upcoming first-person shooter Battlefield Hardline, players will shoot and kill racist anti-government Tea Party types, Gadsden flag and all.Gamers |

This was from 2014.

And how about this game from 2011, called Tea Party Zombies Must Die.  Real subtle, fuckers:

In new game, Tea Partiers make “zombie” targets

“Tea Party Zombies Must Die,” an online video game, features prominent Tea Party figures as targets.

Oh, but killing suffragettes is just so awful!  Look, I’m glad I have the right to vote (I voted early, and a straight Republican ticket because fuck the Democrats) and the suffragettes weren’t that bad, but I bet the ones in this game are probably super obnoxious feminazis.  I just hate the double standard.

In 2016 a game called Stump the Trump was released in which you could kill Trump.  Of course, a game where you can kill Pelosi or whoever is just super bad and wrong, of course.

You Can Brutally Kill Donald Trump In A New Video Game. Progressive Outrage Nowhere To Be Found. | Breitbart

A new browser-based game, “Stump The Trump” allows you to kill Republican frontrunner Donald Trump by dropping a large tree stump on him. His death is |

By the way, that game looks like utter dogshit.

I wrote about Far Cry 5, but it turns out that the game isn’t a “kill Republicans” simulator, and the left was super butthurt about it.

No, Far Cry 5 Isn’t About “Fighting Trump Supporters” – Mandatory

Many have made comparisons between Far Cry 5 and current US politics.

I still have no real desire to play that game, though.

Wolfenstein II conflated Nazis with Trump supporters.

Nazi-killing video game “Wolfenstein II” angers Nazis with ‘Make America Nazi-Free Again’ slogans

A portion of the internet is upset because a game promotes killing virtual Nazis in a virtual America with a play on Trump’s slogan.

Newsweek does the same thing. Newsweek is also dogshit.  Here’s an archive link in case you don’t want to give them any hits.

Rosie O’Donnell promotes a game in which you can push Trump off a cliff (must be some shitty Flash ‘game’ hosted on some random website, because the gameplay sounds nonexistent):

Rosie O’Donnell sparks outrage with Trump-killing game

Conservatives were not amused.

But if I were to make a game in which you push some stupid leftist asshole off of a cliff and straight into a running meat grinder…ooh, that’s violent and disturbing and problematic. 

People Are Excited to Kill Republican White Men in Far Cry 5

One particular teaser for Far Cry 5 is its poster which showcases a group of white people with an American flag and are most probably the bad guys.

This shitty website also seems gleeful that you might have gotten to kill “Republican White Men” in Far Cry 5, and probably got mega butthurt when that wasn’t quite the case.  See, that’s okay.  Not disturbing at all, but shoot some fucking suffragettes, and you’re evil incarnate.

Okay, so you’re probably wondering what the fuss is all about?  So, I haven’t played the Red Dead Redemption series, but I watched the infamous video in question and it appears that yes, you can kill a suffragette character in the game, but it’s considered a crime in the game world.  If you do it in front of witnesses, you incur a bounty that increases over time.  You know, like in most open world RPG games.  I am such a raging goody-two-shoes in these kinds of games.  I don’t commit any crimes if I don’t absolutely have to, and yet I’d do it just to shut that irritating nag up.

The game’s interface looks a lot like that of Horizon Zero Dawn, a game I’m currently playing (one I enjoy, even though it’s got some lefty crap like most games).  I want this game even more now.

So here’s the video in question.  There’s others, but this one is what got the poor widdle feminazis all in a tizzy.  It’s fine to take a chainsaw to zombie Sarah Palin, but feeding some annoying suffragette to an alligator?  Perish the thought!

I thought it was hilarious.  Kind of disturbing, but hilarious, and all the more because leftist are so offended by it.  Also, the suffragette is really annoying and her reasons for wanting the vote are rather modern.  She goes on about how letting women vote would be an end to wars and stuff, and how women would do it better, and that they might even have a woman president.  Ugh.

Oh, and in the leftist games above, the whole point is to actually kill Republicans/Trump/Tea Partiers.  This is just one gamer killing one NPC, and the game pretty much punishes you for it.  Or attempts to.  The leftist games are much worse, obviously.  Yet Vice probably had no qualms about those games.

So, I know what I want for Christmas.

Gab is back!

Gab is back!

Gab haters BTFO!  Gab was back online yesterday afternoon, and I am SO happy.  I really should have had more faith in Andrew Torba and the Gab team.  They found a friendly host, domain registrar and payment processor.  Now, some are claiming that Gab has gone back on its “free speech” thing because they’re asking users to report anything that violates their user guidelines, but I am pretty sure Gab has always had user guidelines.  They can only really be enforced when someone actually reports violations.  Gab is still a small start up.  They can’t afford to pay armies of moderators to comb through all the posts and find violations.  If users see something and don’t think it’s worth reporting, then…there isn’t much Gab can do about that, is there?

But that will probably change.  I don’t know how I feel about that.  I want Gab to be completely free speech.  Every time I see racist or anti-Semitic crap, I just mute it.  That’s what most users do – they see something offensive or objectionable, they mute the user.  I think one exception was lolicon, of which was banned by Gab.  Lolicon is…I think it’s anime drawings that are kind of pedophilic or something.  Some people are super butthurt that lolicon is no longer allowed on Gab.  I can understand banning something like lolicon, and yes, I know that it might not necessarily be illegal, but I can’t blame people for not wanting to accidentally see that.  Plus, I wouldn’t want that found in my browser’s cache.  Just saying.

Anyway, Gab hasn’t been online for a full 24 hours, so it’s a little slow right now.

But, welcome back, Gab.

Gab resurrected?

Gab resurrected?

UPDATE:  They’ve got a new host, but now their domain provider, GoDaddy, has decided to tell them to go fuck themselves. (And this is very stressful for me because this very host and domain are from GoDaddy…dammit). One step forward, two steps back.  Gab is now down while they move to their new host.  From what I hear, the downtime won’t be for long.  As for the Gab.com domain, they might not get it back, but I think there’s no issue with the gab.ai domain.

This is so irritating, and people like Vox Day are not helping with their bullshit gloating and whatnot.  It was indeed the Pittsburgh shooter and not the Florida bomber that had an account at Gab.  The shooter was anti-Trump and also anti-Semitic.  Gab has cooperated with the authorities, handing over his account, and they also terminated said account.

I doubt Twitter or Facebook started out with moderators combing user accounts for bad stuff.  Instead, almost any social site of any sort, from social networks to message boards rely on a reporting system.  User sees something that they think is bad, and they report it to the mods.  Mods look at it and decide if it violates the Terms of Service or not.  Gab staff can’t know if something’s bad unless they themselves see it, or if someone reports it.  Gab did nothing wrong and everything right, and yet companies from their hosts, to their online storefront and payment processors and God knows what else is conspiring to shut them down.

This, first of all, is deeply hypocritical.  These same people expect a Christian to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding, but they can pull this kind of shit when it is so obviously that they’re kicking Gab to the curb because of politics.

Twitter and Facebook don’t have to worry about this shit from their domain registrars.  They also have their own servers, so they don’t need to worry about changing hosts every three months.

There’s a couple of things at work here.  One, the left wants to silence right-wingers.  They thought that this could be achieved by getting right-wingers banned from the mainstream platforms.  But, as that racist idiot Vox kept saying, we need to build our own platforms.  Well, gee, that’s kind of hard unless you’re a fucking billionaire.  At this point, we right-wingers will need to have our own domain registrar, DNS, server farm, store front, payment processor, and, eventually, Internet service provider.  Yes, I said ISP because once we actually get or build those other things, they’ll try to get us banned from our ISPs next.

Second thing…the mainstream social networks clearly don’t like the competition.  Major corporations are always like this – they send their lobbyists to DC and conspire to make doing business extremely hard and expensive for smaller businesses that might pose a threat.  Twitter, Facebook, etc are no different.

They conveniently claim that Gab violated their Terms of Service for having “hateful and violent” content without getting rid of it, but we all know that that is utter bullshit.  What’s really going on here is that they’re using their Terms of Service as an excuse.  They know how this shit goes.  If something goes unreported, it gets missed.  That’s hardly Gab’s fault.  And, as I said, they did everything right when it was brought to their attention.

This is purely political.  They’re all a bunch of leftist assholes who want to silence us, and a week before the midterm elections no less.  Banning us from their shitty little platforms doesn’t work anymore, so they have to destroy ours. Yet they expect Christians to commit blasphemy by baking a cake for gay weddings.  They expect right-wingers to provide them goods and services without complaint, but they can treat us like shit all the time.

Excuse me, but fuck that.  I’m in California right now, but I’m going home on Wednesday, and I will vote early if I can, and I’ll definitely be at the polls on November 6.  Nothing can keep me from voting straight Republican after this.  Stop whining about RINOs because keeping Democrats out of power is the most important thing right now.  Even the RINO-est of RINOs is better than any Democrat.  Those lousy cunts don’t deserve to be within one hundred light years of the levers of power.

(By the way, I am still as sick as a dog, so I won’t be updating the previous post until I get home, basically.  I feel like utter crap right now.)


 

img_1407

They secured a new host. Their priority now is to cooperate with law enforcement regarding the bomber or shooter or whatever. Thank God. There might be some downtime tomorrow as they transition.

I have more to say, but I am really sick right now. I am happy to hear this news. Also, discovered a new social network so I’ll write about that when I’m better.

Gab is dead

Gab is dead

So the Florida “bomber” (I put that in quotes because the things he mailed were nothing more than props – none of them were actual bombs) had an account on Gab.  Therefore, Gab’s hosting company has decided to terminate their account effective 9 am on Monday, basically destroying the site, of which, according to Andrew Torba (the owner), will be down for weeks.

The left is pure evil.  Plenty of past shooters had accounts with YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.  Those respective networks didn’t have to be shut down entirely because of one bad user or even a sizable number of bad users.  Then again, they all have their own servers.

What pisses me off is that the Gab team didn’t anticipate this.  They should have been working on this ages ago.  First, Microsoft boots them off of their Azure service and now their host provider does the same thing, all because of ONE user!  Gab deleted the guy’s account, saved his posts and forwarded them to law enforcement.  And yet this happens anyway.  What the hell?

They need to get their own servers.  Maybe something will happen tomorrow.  I hope so.  I really liked Gab, and I can’t imagine using anything else.  I am so angry right now.